thanx i see the hits all right
but they are all evidently casual nominal & obscure for our purposes
as i dont see any other references to demarcations
& this pdf does indeed appear to be all she wrote in this case
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@w...> wrote:
>
> I just Googled "Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas
> México-Guatemala-Belice" and got 138 hits.
>
> I don't have time to check them out, but the commission is not as obscure as one
> might think.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@y...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Tripoint picture: BZGTMX
>
>
> > doug
> > another reason this bzgtmx commission pdf you bring is
> > a remarkable document
> > even if it doesnt mention a bzgtmx tripoint
> > let alone the truest available bzgtmx tripoint
> > position
> > is the fact that the commission is even tripartite at
> > all
> > for this is indeed the first word we have of this
> > commission as well as its only known work
> >
> > & til guatemala rejoins the bzgt renovation process
> > this unilateral mexican documentation of gtmx is the
> > only sign of cooperation & reintegration toward the
> > fully shared goal of a real & fully legal bzgtmx
> > tripoint
> > as well as toward the separate bipartite goals of
> > fully normal bzgt & bzmx borders
> >
> > for gtmx up to marker 107 doesnt have any such problem
> > & didnt need belize for this pdf
> >
> > so i guess this commission began by bringing gtmx
> > forward & really up to the state of the art as well as
> > they could in 2003 in hopes that not only the bzgtmx
> > tripoint but also both of its other 2 convergent
> > segments would be upgraded sequentially
> >
> > but in fact this whole commission may have been more
> > wishful thinking than anything else
> > beyond what it tangibly did
> > & most wishful of all on the part of mexico so she
> > could get started already with a bzmx demarcation
> > that would gain her this 200 meter strip about 20 km
> > long from bzgtmx to the rio azul
> >
> > & the fact that we dont see a 2004 or 2005 sequel pdf
> > regarding these other 2 borders
> > nor anything at all new regarding them anywhere
> > suggests to me that work remains stalled on them
> > pending the final outcome of bzgtmx
> > & the reentry of gt into the bzgt renovation
> > since the new tripoint position about 200 meters to
> > the east of gtmx marker 107 is in all likelihood going
> > to be the terminal point for bzmx
> > just as it is already fully expected to be the
> > terminal point for the already fully marked but not
> > yet fully legal bzgt
>