Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] yikes could njpa be a condo & thus njnypa & denjpa trilines rather than tripoints
Date: Dec 29, 2005 @ 01:21
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Do we know the year that the Tri State Rock washttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/18068
> installed? Assuming that it and
> the witness monument are not contemporary, the
> laborious explanation on the
> latter was probably devised to correct the known
> waywardness of the former's
> grooves. The USGS bronze disc in the top of the
> former was probably an even
> later addition. It would be interesting to know the
> angles of any die-stamped
> lines that radiate from its central dimple.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 8:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] yikes could njpa be a
> condo & thus njnypa & denjpa
> trilines rather than tripoints
>
>
> > thanx pal
> > tho i keep jack parsells book here with me in the
> > flesh at all times
> >
> > & of course it is a big help as usual
> >
> > in this case it says
> > the big monument says
> > on the nj side
> > south 64 degrees west
> > 72 & a quarter feet from this
> > is the tri state rock
> > which is the northwest end of the ny & nj boundary
> &
> > the north end of the nj & pa boundary
> > &
> > on the ny side
> > the corner between ny & pa is in the center of the
> > delaware river
> > 475 feet due west of the tri state rock
> >
> >
> > & it is this text that gives the lie to & indeed
> > trumps the trifinial diagram that is shown on the
> tri
> > state rock that it witnesses & points toward
> >
> > for in that diagram
> > which is also nicely shown in the book
> > the nypa line does not turn due west from the njny
> > terminal point
> > to give ny its proper 209 degree pie slice as
> > correctly shown only on the 100k scale topo
> > but it is actually shown pivoting slightly in the
> > wrong direction
> > & thus erroneously indicating only about 170
> degrees
> > of the pie for ny
> >
> > & i am pretty sure its depiction of the njpa line
> is
> > likewise mistaken
> > whether njpa proves to be a legal condo or not
> > & that only its depiction of the njny line is
> > technically accurate
> >
> >
> > in the meantime too i have done some more checking
> > & have learned that the njpa line is widely
> presumed
> > to run down the middle of the delaware
> > but that the river is in fact at least a joint
> njpa
> > police jurisdiction from bank to bank
> > all the way from new york to delaware
> > whether it proves to be a true territorial condo
> or
> > not
> >
> > & if it does prove to be a territorial condo from
> bank
> > to bank
> > as the 1783 agreement seems to say & as i believe
> has
> > never been changed but only forgotten
> > perhaps
> > then the tri state rock marks the nw corner of
> this
> > condo & the west end of the njnypa triline
> > aka nj&ny&njpa
> > &
> > your mentioned point in the middle of the river
> 475
> > feet due west of the tri state rock marks the east
> end
> > of the njnypa triline
> > aka ny&pa&njpa
> > while the northeast corner of the condo is farther
> due
> > west on the pennsylvania bank
> >
> >
> > & the correspondingly presumptive denjpa triline
> btw
> > down at the other end of the condo
> > unlike the njnypa triline that runs only halfway
> > across the river to the mentioned nypa corner
> > would appear to run from shore to shore at low
> tide
> > because the delaware arc does
> >
> >
> > another interesting detail in this connection
> > or rather the lack of a detail
> > is that i cant find now nor can i recall ever
> having
> > seen a njpa state line sign in the middle of any
> > delaware river bridge
> > but only welcome signs at the respective ends of
> those
> > bridges
> >
> > not that finding one would necessarily prove
> anything
> > but not finding any is rather suspicious
> >
> > or i should say auspicious
> > for a condo
> >
> >
> > & finally
> > we have always found it very peculiar at njnypa to
> > find pa on the left bank at all
> > havent we
> >
> > & in the absence of any legal text placing it
> there
> > so far
> > the only possible reason i can think of for anyone
> to
> > have ever marked it there is
> > to acknowledge not that pa proper has crossed the
> > river
> > but rather only that a njpa condominial territory
> > extends all the way across
> >
> >
> > so at this point
> > i must say
> > i am fairly itching to run down there to port
> jervis
> > again
> > if just to correct the trifinial diagram on the
> rock
> > with my magic marker
> >
> >
> > --- Jack Parsell <jparsell@...> wrote:
> >
> >> With reference to the the July 6, 2005 message,
> you
> >> can refresh your memory
> >> by going to Brian Butler's site,
> >> www.bjbsoftware.com/corners and clicking on
> >> the NJ-NY-PA location on the map. From that page
> >> click on "Jack Parsell's book"
> >> and you will find a paragraph giving the wording
> of
> >> the inscriptions on the big
> >> monument.
> >>
> >> Jack
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: aletheia kallos
> >> To: boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:01 AM
> >> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] yikes could njpa be a
> >> condo & thus njnypa & denjpa trilines rather than
> >> tripoints
> >>
> >>
> >> you may recall spooky mikes recent revisit to
> >> njnypa &
> >> his illustrated question about it
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> >> which precipitated this also illustratedhttp://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/7397
> >> advancement
> >> in the state of play there
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> >> but left us with these messy questions=== message truncated ===
>