Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] gone fishing for vermont secession & associated new tripoints
Date: Oct 29, 2005 @ 18:49
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> While many of the Indian tribes and nations of theall fronts for dealing with whites
> USA and Canada have various degrees of "internal
> sovereignty" recognized by the respective American
> and Canadian governments under various treaties and
> laws, they do not have sovereignty as recognizable
> by foreign governments. In the USA, these nations
> use their internal "sovereign" status primarily to
> shield themselves from state-level regulation and
> taxation of their various economic activities, even
> while being fully subject to federal taxation and
> regulation with few exceptions. As for the
> reservations at NYONQC, they are adjoining separate
> reservations in the USA and Canada, belonging to two
> technically separate entities: the St. Regis Mohawk
> Tribal Council (USA), and the Mohawk Council of
> Akwesasne (Canada).
> These two bodies sometimesright & thats the only real sovereignty there actually
> cooperate, sometimes not.
>
> Don't forget that American states are "sovereign" as
> well. They have joined themselves together into a
> larger compact, granting to their federal government
> certain enumerated aspects of their sovereignty
> while reserving the others.
>
> Oh, I know, everyone is equally sovereign, etc.,
> etc.;
> but I'm speaking here of sovereignty as the----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> term is commonly used in the larger political world.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Hugh Wallis
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:08 AM
> Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] gone fishing for
> vermont secession & associated new tripoints
>
>
> If you are going to treat vt as "independent" I
> suppose there is a question as to whether these
> really are "the only tricountry points in america
> north of guatemala". If Indian reserves are
> considered territory of sovereign nations as some
> would maintain, what about reserves that straddle
> the CAUS border such as Akwesasne which actually
> contains nyonpq within its boundaries? - does this
> not then create additional such additional north
> american international tripoints?
>
>
>
>
> From: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.comhttp://www.vermontrepublic.org/writings/vtsradicalimperative.html
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> aletheia kallos
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 2:27 AM
> To: boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] gone fishing for
> vermont secession & associated new tripoints
>
>
> will be cruising to montpelier by moonlight
> later
> tonight
> up the ethan allen highway in fact
> to the vermont independence convention
> in the freakin state house starting at 830 in
> the
> morning
> & all day
>
> dont know what help yet another stray
> connecticutie
> could be to them
> but if successful we will be creating the only
> tricountry points in america north of guatemala
>
> or rather actually promoting existing secondary
> tripoints
>
> into causvte & causvtw presumably
>
> so wish us luck
>
> no new tripoint visits are in the offing tho
>
> just going for the fun of breaking away this
> time
>
> in the meantime another page on this topic i
> found
> interesting
>
>
>__________________________________
> beeps