Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: ellicott mound prospects in louisiana
Date: Oct 04, 2005 @ 21:53
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> i wonder how many pairs of counties of the same name abut across state linesOne follow-up mentioned two San Juan Counties that meet diagonally at the Four
> like this
----- Original Message -----
From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:20 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: ellicott mound prospects in louisiana
> ok fantastic
> & please feel entirely free to be the first to bail me out of my predicament
>
> most of my 17 topozone generated prospects are in the felicianas
> but i cant say which are most likely
>
> i would say they are about as tall as a texan & quite massive if they are
> still all there
>
> there is still a pic of a somewhat eroded one
> probably on alfl tho
> linked to
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/8454
> & a verbal description of another probably grander one on alfl about a third
> of the way
> down this field report
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/9185
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@m...>
> wrote:
>> I don't know of any 1799 Ellicott mounds on LAMS, but I've never been a huge
>> student of that particular one of my state's boundary segments. If he left
>> one
>> per mile, surely at least one of the slightly more than 100 should survive.
>>
>> I'm willing to give this some attention when I get caught up post-hurricane.
>> Unless you want to reserve the quest for yourself, I'd even be willing to
>> undertake an expedition to a few of the most likely of your 17 prospects.
>> Just
>> how big are these mounds supposed to be, anyway?
>>
>> Lowell G. McManus
>> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@y...>
>> To: <boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:34 AM
>> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] ellicott mound prospects in louisiana
>>
>>
>> > now that i have shot my mouth off about louisiana
>> > still having some 18th century earthen mounds on the
>> > lams state line that were once esus international
>> > boundary markers
>> > to go along with her 1 remaining 19th century latx
>> > rock
>> > it occurs to me i may well be called upon to
>> > substantiate this claim
>> >
>> > which i cant yet
>> >
>> > i have visited several & learned of several others of
>> > these 1799 ellicott mounds that still mark the alfl
>> > state line
>> > & yikes i have just recalled another famous one on
>> > flga
>> > so i must add georgia to the distinguised fraternity
>> > of the international border convergency of the the
>> > deep south i mentioned to david
>> >
>> > ga fl al ms la tx
>> >
>> > but the point is i have no idea if an ellicott mound
>> > will ever actually be found on lams
>> > hahahaha
>> >
>> > i have seen ellicotts field notes showing that he left
>> > them at roughly 1 mile intervals all the way from the
>> > mississippi to the chattahoochee
>> >
>> > in fact he is known to have begun with that sector &
>> > to have proceeded west to east on it
>> > so
>> > the oldest international boundary marker in america
>> > if one wanted to add the distinction of greatest age
>> > to such a quest
>> > will be the nearest one to ellicotts initial point
>> > presumably near modern lams2cowewi on the mississippi
>> > aka the concordia west feliciana wilkinson tertiary
>> > tripoint
>> >
>> > & i have found 17 promising elevation locations that
>> > are marked squarely on the lams state line by usgs
>> > topography
>> > the nearest to cowewi being so far happily just out of
>> > range of angola
>> > but of course any of these 17 prospects that would be
>> > so good as to actually pan out would do me just fine
>> >
>> > the especial delicacy of the situation tho is that the
>> > bus&ss bible doesnt even mention that this part of the
>> > lams state line was ever retraced & remarked
>> > as it states the alfl part of ellicotts mound line was
>> > in 1853
>> >
>> > so for this reason
>> > & also in view of the fact that the mound line
>> > perfectly coincides with the well marked public land
>> > survey base line
>> > i expect to find no other lams markers anywhere than
>> > just federal corner pins & whatever is left of the
>> > original earthen mounds
>> > if anything
>> >
>> > but any harder evidence or leads than just these
>> > inchoate gropings of mine would be much appreciated in
>> > the meantime
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________
>> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
>> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>