Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] ellicott mound prospects in louisiana
Date: Oct 03, 2005 @ 17:28
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----
From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
To: <boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:34 AM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] ellicott mound prospects in louisiana
> now that i have shot my mouth off about louisiana
> still having some 18th century earthen mounds on the
> lams state line that were once esus international
> boundary markers
> to go along with her 1 remaining 19th century latx
> rock
> it occurs to me i may well be called upon to
> substantiate this claim
>
> which i cant yet
>
> i have visited several & learned of several others of
> these 1799 ellicott mounds that still mark the alfl
> state line
> & yikes i have just recalled another famous one on
> flga
> so i must add georgia to the distinguised fraternity
> of the international border convergency of the the
> deep south i mentioned to david
>
> ga fl al ms la tx
>
> but the point is i have no idea if an ellicott mound
> will ever actually be found on lams
> hahahaha
>
> i have seen ellicotts field notes showing that he left
> them at roughly 1 mile intervals all the way from the
> mississippi to the chattahoochee
>
> in fact he is known to have begun with that sector &
> to have proceeded west to east on it
> so
> the oldest international boundary marker in america
> if one wanted to add the distinction of greatest age
> to such a quest
> will be the nearest one to ellicotts initial point
> presumably near modern lams2cowewi on the mississippi
> aka the concordia west feliciana wilkinson tertiary
> tripoint
>
> & i have found 17 promising elevation locations that
> are marked squarely on the lams state line by usgs
> topography
> the nearest to cowewi being so far happily just out of
> range of angola
> but of course any of these 17 prospects that would be
> so good as to actually pan out would do me just fine
>
> the especial delicacy of the situation tho is that the
> bus&ss bible doesnt even mention that this part of the
> lams state line was ever retraced & remarked
> as it states the alfl part of ellicotts mound line was
> in 1853
>
> so for this reason
> & also in view of the fact that the mound line
> perfectly coincides with the well marked public land
> survey base line
> i expect to find no other lams markers anywhere than
> just federal corner pins & whatever is left of the
> original earthen mounds
> if anything
>
> but any harder evidence or leads than just these
> inchoate gropings of mine would be much appreciated in
> the meantime
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>