Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] & archaeo becomes neo as us2nc3grwawi returns 8000 feet ene<br/>
Date: Sep 10, 2005 @ 16:04<br/>
Author: jim van dura (jim van dura &lt;jimvandura@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="18305.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18307.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic18304.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="18305.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18307.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1859664687">In fact, it seems to me, your whole premise is wrong,<br/>
too. As I visualize this -- whatever the fate of the<br/>
bridge and the other points I have raised -- the<br/>
US2NC3GRWAWI tripoint hasn&#39;t at all returned 8000 feet<br/>
ENE, as your subject title claims; but has much more<br/>
likely been corrected almost due northward, and by<br/>
less than a mile from the position shown on the topo<br/>
-- I would guess to coincide with the northeast corner<br/>
of Wayne Co. shown on the topo. But the triangle of<br/>
land in the story could just as likely be some other<br/>
weird triangle too, leaving the tripoint elsewhere<br/>
than either of us supposes.<br/>
Jimmy  <br/>
 <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; the triangle & tripoint displacement can be easily<br/>
&gt; &gt; visualized here<br/>
&gt; &gt;<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://topozone.com/map.asp?z=18&n=3941172&e=244815&s=50&size=l&datum=nad83&layer=DRG25">http://topozone.com/map.asp?z=18&n=3941172&e=244815&s=50&size=l&datum=nad83&layer=DRG25</a><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
	<br/>
		<br/>
 </span></blockquote>______________________________________________________<br/>
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/">http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/</a></div>