but just to at least consider the multipoints implied
by your offering
i believe there are 4 in all
or 1 tripoint upon each of your 4 cygb maritime
projections
situated 3nm seaward from their respective coastal
baseline points

& these are specifically the points where british
sovereign seas & cyprian sovereign seas meet the high
seas or everyonese sovereign seas if you will
either still only putatively or already legally
tho i am not sure which

& these tripoints in bp code
adopting el for everyones land or high seas
while invoking the blessings of our iso guardians for
doing so
might each be expressed as cyelgb

but then how to distinguish among them

i would suggest
reading from left to right
either
cyelgbww cyelgbwe cyelgbew cyelgbee
or if that is too confusing then
cyelgb1 cyelgb2 cyelgb3 cyelgb4

--- aletheiak <aletheiak@...> wrote:

> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A.
> Nadybal" <lnadybal@c...> wrote:
> > I just posted in "photos" a smalll version of the
> map of the nautical
> > boundaries that the US State Department created
> according to input
> > from the British, after DoS was unable to get the
> map attached to the
> > treaty.
> >
> > Anyone who would like the large scan can ask
> off-line.
> >
> > It is clear that the eastern SBA forms a closed
> area - the E & W
> > borders meet about 32 nautical miles off shore
> (within which there are
> > international waters eliminating any chance of the
> area being an
> > enclave or an exclave. The British claim 3 miles
> of sovereign
> > territory off shore under existing treaties to
> which the British
> > subscribe, and the Cypriots claim 12.
> >
> > With the SBA also comprised of a pumping station
> or whatever it is,
> > the sea boundaries would be incomplete, unless the
> pumping station on
> > the coast has no maritime component (and is
> therefore enclaved). Can
> > anyone help with that?
> >
> >
> > LN
>
> yes
> as you have somewhat correctly recalled
> the power station was believed to have no maritime
> component when last reported
>

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/2158

>
> but also
> beyond the claimed territorial seas of 3nm & 12nm
> from coastal baselines respectively
> the boundaries shown on your map were purely
> hypothetical
> as was explained in its accompanying source document
>

http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/ls049.pdf

> & they most probably still are
>
> so here again it is only your idea of what is clear
> that is confused
>
>
> assumptive reasoning
> while sometimes very useful
> can if carelessly applied actually erode clarity
>
>
> no multipoints however were injured or even
> considered in the making of these messages

____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs