Subject: Re: Russian Lease in Kasakhstan
Date: Jun 08, 2005 @ 16:05
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> I have been able to glean the following regarding the Baikonur Cosmodrome:southwest of the namesake town of Baikonur. Upon the disintegration of the Soviet Union
>
> The huge cosmodrome covers 6,717 square kilometers of land located 370 km
>linked below. Anyone having Lexis or Westlaw subscriptions can retrieve them, or
> A scholarly article (which I have not seen) and the appended agreements are found as
> 30 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW, NO. 1, SPRING, 2004.Kazakhstan. 30 J. Space L 13-25 (2004). [LEXIS] [WESTLAW]
>
> Bjornerud, Maria. Baikonur continues: the new lease agreement between Russia and
> Appended Agreements:Agreement Between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, March 28,
>
> On Basic Principles and Terms of the Utilization of the Baikonur Cosmodrome
>Cooperation in the Effective Use of the Baikonur Facility, January 9, 2004. 30 J. Space L.
> Agreement Between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan on the
>Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan in Ensuring the Functioning of the Baikonur
> Memorandum on Further Development of Cooperation between the Russian
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@c...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:07 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Russian Lease in Kasakhstan
>
>
> >I find a big difference. A leased territory is very different from
> > either a fully sovereign base or a base operated under a status of
> > forces agreement. There are always interesting questions about
> > whether "vestigial" areas like these are still sovereign Russian
> > (exclaves), extraterritorial, occupied by Russia, tolerated until
> > removed or under a stationing agreement of some sort. Shades of status.
> >
> > Len