Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Russian Lease in Kasakhstan
Date: Jun 08, 2005 @ 15:44
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
30 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW, NO. 1, SPRING, 2004.Bjornerud, Maria. Baikonur continues: the new lease agreement between Russia and Kazakhstan. 30 J. Space L. 13-25 (2004). [LEXIS] [WESTLAW]Appended Agreements:
On Basic Principles and Terms of the Utilization of the Baikonur Cosmodrome Agreement Between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, March 28, 1994. 30 J. Space L. 26-31 (2004). [LEXIS] [WESTLAW]Agreement Between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan on the Cooperation in the Effective Use of the Baikonur Facility, January 9, 2004. 30 J. Space L. 32-34 (2004). [LEXIS] [WESTLAW]
Memorandum on Further Development of Cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan in Ensuring the Functioning of the Baikonur Complex, January 9, 2004. 30 J. Space L. 35-36 (2004). [LEXIS] [WESTLAW]
Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA----- Original Message -----From: "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:07 PMSubject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Russian Lease in Kasakhstan>I find a big difference. A leased territory is very different from
> either a fully sovereign base or a base operated under a status of
> forces agreement. There are always interesting questions about
> whether "vestigial" areas like these are still sovereign Russian
> (exclaves), extraterritorial, occupied by Russia, tolerated until
> removed or under a stationing agreement of some sort. Shades of status.
>
> Len