Subject: AW: [BoundaryPoint] eupen and malmedy
Date: Feb 24, 2005 @ 16:39
Author: Wolfgang Schaub ("Wolfgang Schaub" <Wolfgang.Schaub@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Bill:
 
Just a biased opinion (since I am German): Germany had lost WWI - not exactly on the battlefield, but we were the first to simply give up the fighting which did not seem to lead to an end. Consequently, every winning nation could take whatever was available within the limits set by important leaders such as Woodrow Wilson / U.S.A., or whatever was deemed reasonable. The result was the Traty of Versailles. So far, I don't have a "problem".
 
The question that is - in my opinion - more interesting to ask is the following: Why was Belgium (and France, by the way) permitted to grab MORE than the Versailles Treaty stipulated? Examples: Small pieces of land in the district of Monschau (Vennbahn etc. refers); raids in the Ruhr district.
 
NOTE: Treaties are usually not worth the paper that they are written on, if you deal with winners and losers. One of the many reasons why Hitler became so popular.
 
Wolfgang
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bill Burke [mailto:billb@...]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 14:54
An: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [BoundaryPoint] eupen and malmedy

 

These two areas with Moresnet were transfered to Belguim in 1920 . Why was  Eupen, a largely German speaking area transferred across?  The TREATY OF VERSAILLES  encouraged people to choose  the country to which they wished to be attached eg Northern Schleswig went to Denmark, Southern Schleswig stayed in Germany. Can anyone answer this .


__________ NOD32 1.961 (20041230) Information __________

Diese E-Mail wurde vom NOD32 Antivirus System gepr|ft
http://www.nod32.com