http://conlaw.usatoday.findlaw.com/supreme_court/briefs/orig_128/orig_128.mar2004.rpt.pdf
delicious

--- "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...> wrote:

> Okay. I see what you're saying.
>
> The 3-nm state ownership of and jurisdiction over
> its waters are entirely normal
> per the Submerged Lands Act. The wildlife refuge
> (mostly on land but also
> encompassing some tidal areas) is federal property
> (and therefore subject to
> federal management) within the state's jurisdiction.
> All that makes this
> situation unusual is that the coast-length of the
> refuge, and the resultant
> narrowness in proportion to their width of the
> state-owned waters. Other than
> that, the legal situation is identical to that at
> many other places where
> federal property comes down to the shore. Even
> where the exclusive federal
> jurisdiction over land military bases reaches the
> shore, state ownership of and
> jurisdiction over waters beyond continue
> undisturbed.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 10:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] ha alaska claiming
> 150mile proruption of 3nm state
> waters
>
>
> >
> >
>

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=84ORIG

> > for further background
> >
> > & here the claim or title is being proclaimed
> publicly
> > by the governor of the state today
> >
> > the proruption is the narrow generally 3nm band of
> > alaska waters that are sandwiched between the
> federal
> > wildlife refuge & the federal territorial sea
> >
> > you may prefer to think of it as a partial
> proruption
> > since the federal wildlife refuge is still in
> alaska
> > but in terms of the oil development that is being
> > described
> > it is a real proruption
> >
> > & at about 50 to 1
> > it appears to have the greatest length to width
> ratio
> > of any proruption of any kind that i can think of
> > anywhere on the planet
> > tho i hope someone will have some fun beating it
> >
> > --- "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Why is this a "claim" and a "proruption"? It's
> the
> >> normal 3-nm fringe of state
> >> waters that almost all states have. The fact
> that
> >> the land on-shore is
> >> federally owned does not affect ownership of the
> >> adjoining state waters. I
> >> don't think that the feds deny for a moment
> Alaska's
> >> ownership of those waters.
> >>
> >> Lowell G. McManus
> >> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
> >> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:09 AM
> >> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] ha alaska claiming
> 150mile
> >> proruption of 3nm state
> >> waters
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

http://www.news-miner.com/Stories/0,1413,113~7244~2725762,00.html

> >> > http://www.kaktovik.com/anwr_map.jpg
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > __________________________________
> >> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >> > The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
> >> > http://my.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty
> viruses.
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail