Subject: afcnpk pic fallout was Re: Anglo-Scottish Border Images
Date: Feb 03, 2005 @ 23:57
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos
<aletheiak@y...> wrote:

> it would sure be nice to get some more overall
> data on this mysterious cnpk demarcation of which this
> marker 2 is evidently just a part

& all the while
it was all here at the bottom of page 5 of the cnpk ibs study
http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS085.pdf

so to sum up
there are a total of 40 numbered 1964 cnpk monuments
most of them being road stones or pass stones
& probably all looking much like the one in the picture
presumably beginning with number 1 at the real afcnpk tripoint
which may be the only peak stone in the series
& proceeding eastbound from there a total of 325 miles
first thru marker number 2 at kilik pass
& culminating with number 40 at karakoram pass
aka the presumptive cninpk tripoint

as this point lies just east of the hotly inpk contested siachen
glacier
the demarcation seems to confer the entire glacier on pakistan

detail map of this latter area
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/siachen.htm

> > moreover your remarkable discovery suggests afcnpk
> > may be
> > marked by a similar rock
> > hypothetically marker 1 of the same series
> > & that the numbered sequence may proceed eastward
> > from
> > afcnpk thru kilik pass toward some unknown
> > destination
> >
> > perhaps all the way at the east end of the 1963
> > pak cession to
> > china of the indopak disputed land shown in
> > crosshatching here
> >
> >
>
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/kashmir
> > _disputed_2002.jpg
> >
> > but i havent been able to find any other evidence
> > of this
> > extraordinary cnpk demarcation of 1984
> >
> > so i am thinking there could be something a bit
> > unusual & even
> > secretive going on here at these remote locations
> > with china & pakistan cooperating to cut india out
> > of several
> > disputed areas
> >
> > fascinating in any case

indeed