yes i understand thats why you might want to know that len
but i still dont see why we would want to know that
for what you call history & the past
is
in my view
by & large
just a history of crime & woe
& not really very appealing or useful at all
& i would actually not mind taking a breather from such history myself
hahahahaha
& would like to dwell a little in a brighter present
where i am actually having a fantastic time just now answering you
& dwelling as i do on our still brighter future
ahhh for the lessons of a brighter present & future
hahahahaha
dont you think we have had enough lessons from freakin history already
hahahahahaha
for thats just tired old conventional wisdom farting again my friend
& please dont stop anything len
& most of all dont stop telling me to stop
for right or wrong i love you just the way you are
nor do i think i will ever get used to you
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@c...>
wrote:
>
> >Kallos wrote "...why would we even want to know that"
>
> We'd perhaps want to know that in order to learn from history.
> Some of the members live for the past - which isn't "right"
> or "wrong - so get used to it and stop asking.
> LN
>
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos
> <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > Wolfgang Schaub <Wolfgang.Schaub@c...> wrote:
> > I can see now why Austria favors the condominium philosophy - it
> would
> > provide them a greater share of the lake.
> >
> > But we still don't know which "philosophy" prevailed during the
> Anschluss
> > period.
> >
> >
> >
> > true but again why would we even want to know that
> >
> > surely you dont imagine it is relevant to finding the true atchde
> tripoint position or legal status today or ever
> >
> >
> >
> > & in your ensuing train of thought i am still looking for the
> locomotive too
> >
> > or any motive at all for that matter
> >
> > like what is your pleasure in this odd excursion anyway
> >
> > just strangeness for its own sake perhaps
> >
> > well ok i guess i can vaguely appreciate that
> >
> >
> >
> > but one cant necessarily agree with your conclusion or rather
your
> terminal non sequitur about wet & dry real estate valuations
> >
> > at least not in cases where exploitable resources are involved
> >
> >
> >
> > nor can one necessarily see how any of this sheds any light on
your
> chosen title or vice versa
> >
> >
> >
> > but maybe we should just adopt an uncritical free pass or laissez
> faire approach to all nonsense now that you have embraced it so
> emphatically
> >
> > after all bp does remain everyones land even if it is no longer
> just the multipointing society that discovered everyones land
> >
> > so you undoubtedly have a right to be here & express yourself
> >
> > & there is nothing that says you ever have to make sense
> >
> > so please dont worry about any of this
> >
> > but i guess what it boils down to is
> >
> > do you actually want your thinking to be entertained or not
> >
> >
> >
> > Has the late "Fuehrer" missed a point here? Had he adopted the
> > condominium philosophy in time he would have caused trouble to
the
> Swiss,
> > which he was always looking for.
> >
> > And what a pity that Liechtenstein does not make it to the shores
> of Lake
> > Constance! We would have a fourth party to gamble with.
> >
> > It appears that regulating borders is more difficult when it
faces
> fluid
> > materia. On solid ground we seem to have an easier play. An
inverse
> > proportionality to the higher value that land has over water.
> >
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo!