Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] surprise
Date: Dec 06, 2004 @ 13:35
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


When I wrote about "double printing of the red township numbers," I meant
"section numbers."

As soon as I awoke this morning, this error came to mind. I've known how
sections, townships, and ranges work since I was a small child, so it's
embarrassing.

Lowell G. McManus
S25, T2N, R10W, La. Mer.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] surprise


>
> Mike D.,
>
> La Paz County (according to its official web site at
> http://www.co.la-paz.az.us/ ) was formed on January 1, 1983. It was part of
> Yuma County prior to that date.
>
> The visible line running westward from the vicinity of the monuments shown on
> the 24 K map at your TopoZone link below is not a county boundary. It is a
cut
> line where two maps have been pieced together. Please note that the same cut
> line also runs eastward, giving the appearance of a double county line. Proof
> that it is a cut line is the double printing of the red township numbers "31"
> and "32" in different fonts. The upper map might be of 1967 vintage, but the
> lower one is obviously of post-1983 (post-La Paz) vintage. That is why the
> upper map shows the land west of the meridian boundary to be Yuma County,
while
> the lower one shows it to be La Paz. Before 1983 this was the
> Maricopa-Yavapai-Yuma tripoint, and since 1983 it is La Paz-Maricopa-Yavapai.
> The remainder of Yuma County is still there south of La Paz.
>
> Paz,
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA