Subject: Re: surprise
Date: Dec 06, 2004 @ 16:48
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> When I wrote about "double printing of the red township numbers," Imeant
> "section numbers."known how
>
> As soon as I awoke this morning, this error came to mind. I've
> sections, townships, and ranges work since I was a small child, soit's
> embarrassing.was part of
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> S25, T2N, R10W, La. Mer.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@m...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 6:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] surprise
>
>
> >
> > Mike D.,
> >
> > La Paz County (according to its official web site at
> > http://www.co.la-paz.az.us/ ) was formed on January 1, 1983. It
> > Yuma County prior to that date.monuments shown on
> >
> > The visible line running westward from the vicinity of the
> > the 24 K map at your TopoZone link below is not a countyboundary. It is a
> cutthe same cut
> > line where two maps have been pieced together. Please note that
> > line also runs eastward, giving the appearance of a double countyline. Proof
> > that it is a cut line is the double printing of the red townshipnumbers "31"
> > and "32" in different fonts. The upper map might be of 1967vintage, but the
> > lower one is obviously of post-1983 (post-La Paz) vintage.right you are
> > upper map shows the land west of the meridian boundary to be YumaCounty,
> whileMaricopa-Yavapai.
> > the lower one shows it to be La Paz. Before 1983 this was the
> > Maricopa-Yavapai-Yuma tripoint, and since 1983 it is La Paz-
> > The remainder of Yuma County is still there south of La Paz.
> >
> > Paz,
> >
> > Lowell G. McManus
> > Leesville, Louisiana, USA