Subject: Re: Re: [BoundaryPoint] The easternmost point in Europe
Date: Nov 15, 2004 @ 22:10
Author: Andrew T. Patton (Andrew T. Patton <andrew@AndrewPatton.com>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>I would suggest the middle of the Panama Canal as the effective
>While the NGS has often furnished its maps of Europe and Asia with a green line
>separating the two, I have never seen them do the same for the two Americas or
>for Asia and Africa.
>
>I would suggest that the COPA political boundary is an unacceptable limit
>between the Americas for at least the following reasons:
>
>1. Were there not two Americas prior to the 1903 independence of Panamá from
>Colombia?
>
>2. Nowhere does the NGS's Europe-Asia boundary follow a political boundary.
>
>I would, rather, suggest the narrowest part of the isthmus. That would be even
>with the Golfo de San Blas.
>
>However, an excellent argument can be made that the continental limit should be
>across the lowest part of the cordillera that runs the length of the isthmus.
>That is, indeed, where the Americas would become two separate land masses if sea
>level were to rise sufficiently. (This thinking is influenced by the actual
>experience at the Bering Strait between Asia and North America at the end of the
>most recent ice age, and perhaps at the Strait of Gibraltar, the Dardanelles,
>and the Bosporus at various times in prehistory.) This lowest part of Panamá is
>the approximate location of the canal.
>
>Between Asia and Africa, both the narrowest and lowest parts of the Isthmus of
>Suez are the approximate location of the canal there.
>
>So, we can add Panamá and Egypt to Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and
>Turkey in the list of countries with continuous intercontinental sovereignty.