Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: servitudes/extraterritoriality.
Date: Oct 28, 2004 @ 03:45
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----
From: "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:03 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: servitudes/extraterritoriality.
>
>
> Hi.
>
> "Servitudes" - is that the term used "down under"? Here in the US, at
> least, we call these real property access conditions "easements".
> I guess we call it that because you want to "back in" quietly when
> you are hovering over someone else's property - especially in this
> country. :-)
>
> What is the term that is used elsewhere?
>
> LN
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Brendan Whyte <bwhyte@u...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Any enclave manifests by its very existence a cause of a certain
> degree of
> > 'extraterritoriality' or rather dilution of sovereignty to the host
> state.
> > By recognising its existence, the host state is obliged to
> provide/allow
> > access from the home state to it. This is the same in international
> law, as
> > in domestic law. If you own a property and sell off a section of the
> middle
> > of that property, you are obliged, by that sale, to allow access
> between
> > that sold section and the outer edge of your property/a public road.
> > The India/Portugal ICJ case over Dadra & Nagar Haveli had an article
> by a
> > law professor going trough the legal instances in the domestic laws of
> > dozens of countries.
> >
> > Brendan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>