"& anyway how could anyone get into anything except by
crossing its border"
I thought the same thing. For of course one needs to
cross a border to get into IE*, be it IE-UK or IE-High
Seas. I assume based on the text that border when
capitalized as "Border" is a reference to IE-UK
specifically. Perhaps this is common in Ireland?
(* = unless you are conceived/born etc. into IE)
ROI would indeed have a significant Return On
Investment if they and UK would mark a boundary - at
least from the increased tourist revenues from
borderfreaks.
--- aletheiak <
aletheiak@...> wrote:
> well
> nobody claimed it would be relevant or meaningful
> but only timely & crimely
>
>
> & anyway
> how could anyone get into anything except by
> crossing its border
>
> what is really surprising about this report is that
> only about 80
> percent of the people got in this way
>
> what about the other fifth
>
> how did they get in
>
>
> & of course most of what is called border crime
> comprises
> supposed offenses that wouldnt even exist if the
> borders didnt
>
> the borders themselves are the fundamental offense
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Meynell
> <knm@m...> wrote:
> >
> > >This doesn't surprise me, as there was no sign at
> all that
> there was any
> > >law enforcement, border patrol, customs,
> immigration, or
> even interested
> > >parties anywhere near the border!
> >
> > How is this different to the borders between
> Schengen
> countries? The UK and
> > the ROI operate a common travel area, so there
> doesn't need
> to be
> > immigration controls.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kevin Meynell
>
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com