Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Timely article about IE (ROI?)-UK
Date: Sep 24, 2004 @ 15:09
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Kevin wrote:

> How is this different to the borders between Schengen countries? The UK and
> the ROI operate a common travel area, so there doesn't need to be
> immigration controls.

If that's their choice, they shouldn't be surprised that the border attracts
various misconduct. They have invited it, so they shouldn't complain. When
they wake up, they know how to stop it. That doesn't mean that legitimate
travel or commerce should stop.

Leaving an international boundary totally unguarded (and in this case even
blatantly unmarked) is like leaving ones door unlocked.

Mike D. wrote:

> & of course most of what is called border crime comprises
> supposed offenses that wouldnt even exist if the borders didnt

True, but a boundary must exist if Ireland wants to be a separate nation from
the United Kingdom, which it became in 1921 after long agitation. Sovereign
nations are free to have differing laws and governmental systems. (That is why
we have different nations.) This, and not the boundary, is what creates the
opportunities and incentives for misdeeds. In the unlikely event that two
separate nations had precisely the same laws, there would be no such incentives
or opportunities.

Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA