Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: enclaves on stamps<br/>
Date: Sep 23, 2004 @ 02:08<br/>
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman &lt;mikekaufman79@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="15550.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15552.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic15250.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="15550.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15552.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-390951058">but no living thing satisfies this qualification.  for<br/>
if it were only one point wide, it would have not<br/>
matter at all.<br/>
<br/>
--- &quot;L. A. Nadybal&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:lnadybal@...">lnadybal@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; You wrote:<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &quot;From the second interpretation, it is a<br/>
&gt; pene-enclave as it is not<br/>
&gt; possible to reach Jungholz via the rest of Austria<br/>
&gt; without ever<br/>
&gt; leaving Austria. Since it is one point wide on top<br/>
&gt; of a mountain.&quot;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; I think it is possible - as long as one is only as<br/>
&gt; wide as or less<br/>
&gt; wide than the point that connects the two areas.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; LN<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
		<br/>
 </span></blockquote>__________________________________<br/>
Do you Yahoo!?<br/>
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail">http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail</a></div>