Anytime you can't justify or back up your wild claims,
you get caught up in semantic nit-picking, whining and
avoiding the topic at hand. Instead of this why not
just answer:
1. By your reasoning, anyone could say that the other
4
exclaves no longer exist either because they haven't
been "heard from" since the date of the last map
showing them. If that is 2002 (hypothetically), does
that mean we should question whether they've existed
for the last 2 years? (I say no.)
2. And again read what you wrote: "& i certainly cant
prove the negative rather it is the job of the
clavoscopist to prove the affirmative." This is
inherently illogical. It is the job of the person
challenging the status quo to show some kind of
evidence disproving it, not the other way around.
this neither is nor was shrill and is all very simple
indeed.
--- aletheiak <
aletheiak@...> wrote:
> ok len you cant be blamed for thinking we were
> talking about
> enclaves on stamps because the message title still
> does say
> enclaves on stamps
> even now
> oops
>
> but the claves we were discussing in the text you
> have added to
> here are not the ones on the stamps that the thread
> began with
> & that you probably still have in mind
>
> rather these claves are not on any stamps at all
> that we know of
> but only on a 1976 &or 1978 map
> so far as we know
>
>
> & i dont believe there is any question of nihilism
> or any other sort
> of denial here
>
> rather we were only following up on what i think
> chris or
> someone else had previously & i think very sensibly
> said of
> these maybeclaves
> namely
> ob sie je eine reale rolle gespielt haben ist
> unbekannt
>
>
> or in plain barbarian
>
> whether they
> e v e r
> actually functioned as claves
> is
> unknown
>
>
> evidently a healthy agnosticism rather than any
> nihilism there
>
>
>
> & mike
> when the banter gets so shrill as this
> dont you worry the turtle might stick his head up
> from his mozart
> again as he last did in message 13685
> hahahahaha
> i can just see him asking us to cancel his
> subscription again
> hahaha
> certainly one of our funniest moments
>
>
>
> but anyway i still really dont follow you here
> so please just tell me
> quietly & simply if possible
> exactly what i am ignoring that i did say
> & exactly which of your writings i am refusing to
> read
> so i can at least consider or reconsider what you
> mean
>
>
> & i dont think any of us is guilty of anything
>
> but i do think we are all super heroes
>
> in fact i am sure of it
>
> we are all positively divine
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A.
> Nadybal"
> <lnadybal@c...> wrote:
> > Map stamps are usually issued to press border
> claims - it
> takes too
> > much deliberate work in creating a stamp showing
> an exclave
> for the
> > reasoning human being to think that what is
> pictured on map
> stamps
> > doesn't exist (or didn't when issued). What's on
> new stamps
> (and
> > these are relatively new) does exist in the mind
> of the stamp
> issuing
> > party, and you can be certain that in the mind of
> the issuer, it
> > "hasn't been 20-odd years since it was last heard
> of". Your
> logic is
> > like like saying Columbus hadn't "heard of" the
> Americas prior
> to
> > 1492, and therefore, it wasn't there or that it
> was and had gone
> away
> > at some earlier point in time if it had ever been
> there. Nihilist
> > philosophy. The Indians who greeted Columbus on
> his arrival
> were
> > there - they'd been hearing of exclave America for
> quite some
> time.
> > LN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > I am not delusional. I am not misrepresenting
> what
> > > you say. You are just ignoring what you
> actually DID
> > > say. You refuse to read what I wrote or answer
> the
> > > questions I have posed to you specifically.
> > > Again read what you wrote: "& i certainly cant
> prove
> > > the negative rather it is the job of the
> clavoscopist
> > > to prove the affirmative" This is tantamount to
> > > assuming guilty until proven innocent. Guilty
> until
> > > proven innocent mentality? - Now THAT'S
> delusional...
> > > If you cast doubt on these 2 claves as of 1978,
> cast
> > > doubt on everything you see.
> > > Reread message 15122 - there is no need to dress
> up
> > > like a superhero. :)
> > >
> > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ah but now you appear to be deliberately
> > > > misunderstanding as
> > > > well as deliberately misrepresenting what i
> actually
> > > > said & did
> > > >
> > > > my questioning what you believe & claim exists
>
> > > > & even my wondering out loud if anyone has
> seen any
> > > > evidence
> > > > of it at any time in the past quarter of a
> century
> > > > for starters
> > > > is not the same as assuming it no longer
> exists
> > > >
> > > > nor the same as saying it doesnt exist
> > > >
> > > > let alone as wanting it not to exist
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > you are not even close on any of the above
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > for this is not me mike
> > > > nor my reasoning
> > > > but only your specific self delusions about me
> & it
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & such is the grandeur of your delusions that
> you
> > > > are even
> > > > reckoning them common sense now
> > > >
> > > > but i just dont share any of this sense with
> you in
> > > > common
> > > >
> > > > indeed my vote is of no consensus & no
> confidence in
> > > > any of
> > > > what you are now saying about me
> > > > or about anything here below
> > > >
> > > > & you only grow more delirious as you go
> > > >
> > > > a map
> > > > & the representations on it
> > > > like all other data
> > > > are never thorough
> > > > but are always selective & necessarily partial
>
> > > >
> > > > as well as dated
> > > >
> > > > & often just plain wrong besides
> > > >
> > > > & thinking they necessarily arent could be the
> > > > mother of all
> > > > delusion
> > > > as of all your specific delusions here
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> > > > Kaufman
> > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > It's not a fantasy, it's common sense. The
> maps
> > > > and
> > > > > borders were thoroughly done over in 1978.
> The
> > > > claves
> > > > > were left as they were. You can't just
> assume
> > > > > something goes away because you yourself
> want it
> > > > to go
> > > > > away. What real evidence do you have saying
> they
> > > > no
> > > > > longer exist?
> > > > > By your reasoning, anyone could say that the
> other
> > > > 4
> > > > > exclaves no longer exist either because they
> > > > haven't
> > > > > been "heard from" since the date of the last
> map
> > > > > showing them. If that is 2002
> (hypothetically),
> > > > does
> > > > > that mean we should question whether they've
> > > > existed
> > > > > for the last 2 years? (No.)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > you have finally hit it in your afterword
> here
> > > > > > maestro
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & the tripoints sometimes do indeed move
> about
> > > > etc
> > > > > > so we only know for sure what was
> supposedly
> > > > true at
> > > > > > the time
> > > > > > they were last visited &or reported etc
> > > > > > so i absolutely agree with you about the
> > > > tripoints &
> > > > > > claves equally
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & thats one reason for & benefit of
> reporting on
> > > > > > them repeatedly
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & you have proved these particular crumbs
> > > > existed
> > > > > > circa 1976 &
> > > > > > possibly as recently as 1978
> > > > > > tho i believe your logic is still
> questionable
> > > > there
> > > > > > in msg 15345
> > > > > > hahaha
> > > > > > however unworth questioning just to reduce
> by 2
> > > > the
> > > > > > 28 years
> > > > > > during which i still do believe they
> havent been
> > > > > > heard from
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & in the meantime whole governments &
> nation
> > > > states
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > come & gone ferociously several times all
> thru
> > > > there
> > > > > > which do in fact now recognize & mention
> all the
> > > > > > well known
> > > > > > classmates of these maybeclaves but have
> > > > apparently
> > > > > > never
> > > > > > mentioned these crumbs during at least 26
> of
> > > > these
> > > > > > 28 years
> > > > > >
> > > > > > so i am content to believe them real as of
> 1976
> > > > or
> > > > > > maybe 1978
> > > > > > & looking forward to more & fresher data
> > > > > > via whatever aspiring clavoscopist
> provides it
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & i have just been responding to your
> claim in
> > > > > > message 15272
> > > > > > of what you think we have
> > > > > > by telling you i know we once had them but
> i
> > > > > > seriously question if
> > > > > > we still have them
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i am not stuck in your fantasy tho
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & anyway time will tell
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> Michael
> > > > > > Kaufman
> > > > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > By the same token, the tripoint could
> have
> > > > > > > moved...maybe the cartogrophers just
> didn't
> > > > know
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > it. The AMAZGE tripoint could have
> moved (or
> > > > even
> > > > > > > ceased to exist!) - it's just that it
> wasn't
> > > > shown
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > said, "if something isnt shown or said
> it
> > > > only
> > > > > > means
> > > > > > > it wasnt shown or said not that it was
> or
> > > > wasnt a
> > > > > > > fact."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > thanx
> > > > > > > > good idea specifically
> > > > > > > > & good for the aspiring clavoscopist
> to be
> > > > so
> > > > > > > > diligent in any case
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but one cant presume the cartographers
> knew
> > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > than what they actually drew or wrote
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if something isnt shown or said
> > > > > > > > it only means it wasnt shown or said
> > > > > > > > not that it was or wasnt a fact
> > > > > > > > & not that anyone had any specific
> inkling
> > > > about
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > or even any
> > > > > > > > general awareness of it
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "Lowell G.
> > > > > > > > McManus"
> > > > > > > > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Mike D. asked:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > if the claves were discontinued
> > > > > > > > > > their borders couldnt & wouldnt
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > > > > redrawn but only
> > > > > > > > > > eliminated or forgotten
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > would the mapmakers have just
> scrawled a
> > > > big
> > > > > > > > purple cross
> > > > > > > > > > over each clave to let us know in
> that
> > > > case
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > or exactly how would they redraw
> > > > something
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > completely
> > > > > > > > > > vanished
> > > > > > > > > > short of erasing it
> > > > > > > > > > which they couldnt do
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I the addition of a purple overprint
> was
> > > > the
> > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > means of
> > > > > > > > revision available,
> > > > > > > > > the cartographers would likely have
> added
> > > > a
> > > > > > text
> > > > > > > > notation in
> > > > > > > > purple that
> > > > > > > > > such-and-such claves no longer
> existed. I
> > > > > > suggest
> > > > > > > > that you go
> > > > > > > > back and check
> > > > > > > > > the margins and legend of the map
> for such
> > > > > > purple
> > > > > > > > text.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > > > > > > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________
> > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo!
> > > > Shopping.
> > > > > > > http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB
> messages!
> > > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We
> finish.
> > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail