Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible BNCNMYTWVN 5-Country Reef and Obelisk
Date: Sep 11, 2004 @ 01:21
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> tho the philippines do claim several of the spratly_______________________________
> islands
> & tho all 6 bncnmyphtwvn countries claim at least 1
> spratly each
> the philippines dont claim louisa reef as the
> bncnmytwvn 5 do
>
> moreover
> since none of the other individual spratlys is
> claimed by more
> than 4 of the 6 spratly countries
> & since no other place in the world is claimed by
> more than 3
> countries
> louisa reef stands alone as the hottest real estate
> on earth
> &or under the sea
>
> for the basis of my arithmetic
> please refer again to message 14049
> & especially to the color coded annotated map in the
> link there
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > Why not 6 country with Philippines?
> >
> > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> >
> > > yes we have had this report at least since
> message
> > > 14049
> > > when i still imagined she was only a 4country
> reef
> > >
> > > see under louisa in alphabetical list of
> spratlys in
> > > the middlebury
> > > link there
> > >
> > > only later did it dawn on me that the bruneian
> claim
> > > to her was
> > > just as real as the 4 others
> > > despite its being unique in not acknowledging
> the
> > > reef as dry
> > > land but only as maritime territory
> > >
> > > but i generally prefer my theories as spare &
> lean
> > > as possible
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
> > > McManus"
> > > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > > Each theory is as good as the other.
> > > >
> > > > Do we know for fact that the lighthouse or
> > > navigation beacon
> > > was Malaysian, or
> > > > is that theory too?
> > > >
> > > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@y...>
> > > > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 1:47 PM
> > > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible
> BNCNMYTWVN
> > > 5-Country Reef and Obelisk
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > well no need to postulate a greater mystery
> in
> > > order to solve
> > > a
> > > > > lesser one
> > > > >
> > > > > & i think a single 5country obelisk in the
> sea
> > > is plenty for the
> > > time
> > > > > being
> > > > >
> > > > > the so called lighthouse or beacon
> > > > > whether it was mounted atop the obelisk or
> not
> > > > > could easily have just been a small
> reflector or
> > > glow type
> > > > >
> > > > > the lawn of my estate here on cream hill is
> > > littered with solar
> > > > > powered night lights comprised of 6inch
> plastic
> > > cubes that
> > > just
> > > > > stick into the ground
> > > > >
> > > > > & the 2 blocklike forms you have spotted on
> the
> > > reef could
> > > easily
> > > > > have come from the top of the single known
> > > obelisk
> > > > > the height of which does indeed appear to
> have
> > > been
> > > reduced
> > > > > as detailed below
> > > > > by the necessary 15 or 20 percent to account
> for
> > > them
> > > > > give or take a beacon
> > > > > & were perhaps shot down by the same chinese
> > > gunboat
> > > that
> > > > > perhaps shot out the light
> > > > >
> > > > > leaving stone markers to claim sovereignty
> over
> > > islets
> > > > > &or destroying such markers to deny it
> > > > > has been a fixture thruout the china seas
> since
> > > 1895
> > > > >
> > > > > after malaysia destroyed the chinese marker
> here
> > > > > it seems to me
> > > > > the least china could have done was destroy
> the
> > > malaysian
> > > light
> > > > >
> > > > > anyway so little for my theory
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>