Subject: Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU
Date: Jul 09, 2004 @ 03:47
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> E.g. this one:http://www.luxalbum.com/communes/echternach/mompach/moe
>
> Peter S.<aletheiak@y...>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> wrote:aerial pic
> > exactly
> > & the river condo is the joint territory & property of both
> > governments
> > so i would imagine any islands in it are also
> >
> > unless someone could have bought them
> >
> > from both governments to be sure
> >
> >
> > but isnt there some fantastic german zoomable map or
> > site or something we could use to track them all downislands
> >
> > & then inquire locally
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > I drove along the DELU condo in april and so no other
> > than small plots of land.government
> > >
> > > But I wonder if someone owns this land, and if it's
> > property, and which government?near
> > >
> > > Jesper
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: aletheiak
> > > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:10 PM
> > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR)
> > DEFRLUSmaardijk"
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter
> > > <smaardijk@y...> wrote:four
> > > > I think that the condominium is formed by the entire river
> > > between
> > > > Luxembourg and Germany, i.e. two stretches, limited by
> > > straightthat
> > > > lines across the river, and the respective river banks. A
> > border
> > > is
> > > > normally first defined, then marked. The markers were
> > > therefore
> > > > placed after it was known where the border was. And
> > > border wasborder
> > > > the river bank. Now it is a bit impractical to place border
> > > markers
> > > > half in the water, half on the land, and anyway, the
> > wasof
> > > > formed by a natural linear feature, namely the river bank.
> > Some
> > > > border markers were placed, but only at more or less
> > > important
> > > > places, like bridges and confluences. And at the termini
> > thebe
> > > > condominia, of course. So these markers are bound to
> > > witnessborder
> > > > markers. By the way, there are lots of examples of
> > riversmark
> > > that
> > > > have the border in the middle of the stream (mostly the
> > > thalweg),
> > > > with border markers on both sides that equally don't
> > theOur
> > > border
> > > > exactly.
> > > >
> > > > But there are markings that do mark the actual border
> > > accurately,
> > > > nevertheless. For instance the round metal plates on
> > bridges
> > > and on
> > > > the former customs house at the Keppeshausen
> > bridgehead.
> > > But these
> > > > are places where manmade features cross into the
> > > condominium, and the
> > > > border was probably already fixed at that time.
> > > >
> > > > But the border stones alongside the Mosel, Sauer, and
> > > are, IBut
> > > > think, not exactly on the border, with the exception of the
> > > > binational tripoint markers north and south of Vianden.
> > theyNielsen"
> > > are
> > > > not on the tripoints DEDELULU - they are just on DELU.
> > > >
> > > > Peter S.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> > > <jesniel@i...>marker(s)
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > It's a good observasion. I vaguely remember it being
> > > disussed
> > > > before, either on BP or at GCEBE.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are all DELU-LU markers (and the binational
> > > aroundbinational
> > > > Vianden) just witness markers?
> > > > >
> > > > > There should be a similar map of the northern
> > > tripointcouldn't
> > > > somwhere (or perhaps I can find it in my files). We
> > findside
> > > any
> > > > southern binational tripoint markers at Vianden.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have anybody been close to the northern binational
> > marker
> > > to see
> > > > the inscription?
> > > > >
> > > > > Jesper
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Michael Kaufman
> > > > > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 4:45 AM
> > > > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR)
> > near
> > > DEFRLU
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If the condo border on the DE side is where the river
> > meets
> > > the
> > > > > cement cliff-like sidewalls, then what about the LU
> > ofland
> > > the
> > > > > river? The DELU-LU boder proceeds from the
> > DELU-FR-LU
> > > tripoint
> > > > and
> > > > > then makes a turn to the right when it reaches a
> > monument.
> > > But
> > > > the
> > > > > monument is on land. Does this mean some of the
> > isthe
> > > condo
> > > > > territory? Or is the monument a witness marker for
> > > triline?3151
> > >
> > >
> > > just for the record
> > > this question was first answered by peter in message
> > >my
> > > & it was then first asked by jesper in message 3236
> > >
> > > & finally mats promised to answer it in message 3281
> > >
> > >
> > > but while seeking these original messages just to check
> > > sanitymessages
> > > i also chanced again on mats equally excellent
> > 3312Terms
> > > & 3324
> > > in which he reported
> > > among many other choice details
> > > the existence of 15 still extant condo islands
> > >
> > > real condo land territory
> > >
> > > places where living or native condoites might be sought
> > >
> > > if indeed there are any such joint people living anywhere
> > > since the demise of moresnet
> > >
> > >
> > > so
> > > since the defrlu island has been found to be uninhabited
> > > can anyone identify or locate any of the remaining 14 delu
> > > islands
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
> > >
> > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> > of Service.