Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU
Date: Jul 08, 2004 @ 20:26
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@image.dk>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Map of DELU island 1:20000
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesper Nielsen
To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU

Local German land no much help:
http://www.webgis-schule.de/website/rlp/
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: aletheiak
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU

exactly
& the river condo is the joint territory & property of both
governments
so i would imagine any islands in it are also

unless someone could have bought them

from both governments to be sure


but isnt there some fantastic german zoomable map or aerial pic
site or something we could use to track them all down

& then inquire locally

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> I drove along the DELU condo in april and so no other islands
than small plots of land.
>
> But I wonder if someone owns this land, and if it's government
property, and which government?
>
> Jesper
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: aletheiak
>   To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:10 PM
>   Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near
DEFRLU
>
>
>   --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
>   <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
>   > I think that the condominium is formed by the entire river
>   between
>   > Luxembourg and Germany, i.e. two stretches, limited by four
>   straight
>   > lines across the river, and the respective river banks. A
border
>   is
>   > normally first defined, then marked. The markers were
>   therefore
>   > placed after it was known where the border was. And that
>   border was
>   > the river bank. Now it is a bit impractical to place border
>   markers
>   > half in the water, half on the land, and anyway, the border
was
>   > formed by a natural linear feature, namely the river bank.
Some
>   > border markers were placed, but only at more or less
>   important
>   > places, like bridges and confluences. And at the termini of
the
>   > condominia, of course. So these markers are bound to be
>   witness
>   > markers. By the way, there are lots of examples of border
rivers
>   that
>   > have the border in the middle of the stream (mostly the
>   thalweg),
>   > with border markers on both sides that equally don't mark
the
>   border
>   > exactly.
>   >
>   > But there are markings that do mark the actual border
>   accurately,
>   > nevertheless. For instance the round metal plates on
bridges
>   and on
>   > the former customs house at the Keppeshausen
bridgehead.
>   But these
>   > are places where manmade features cross into the
>   condominium, and the
>   > border was probably already fixed at that time.
>   >
>   > But the border stones alongside the Mosel, Sauer, and Our
>   are, I
>   > think, not exactly on the border, with the exception of the
>   > binational tripoint markers north and south of Vianden. But
they
>   are
>   > not on the tripoints DEDELULU - they are just on DELU.
>   >
>   > Peter S.
>   >
>   >
>   > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
>   <jesniel@i...>
>   > wrote:
>   > > It's a good observasion. I vaguely remember it being
>   disussed
>   > before, either on BP or at GCEBE.
>   > >
>   > > Are all DELU-LU markers (and the binational marker(s)
>   around
>   > Vianden) just witness markers?
>   > >
>   > > There should be a similar map of the northern binational
>   tripoint
>   > somwhere (or perhaps I can find it in my files). We couldn't
find
>   any
>   > southern binational tripoint markers at Vianden.
>   > >
>   > > Have anybody been close to the northern binational
marker
>   to see
>   > the inscription?
>   > >
>   > > Jesper
>   > >   ----- Original Message -----
>   > >   From: Michael Kaufman
>   > >   To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>   > >   Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 4:45 AM
>   > >   Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR)
near
>   DEFRLU
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >   If the condo border on the DE side is where the river
meets
>   the
>   > >   cement cliff-like sidewalls, then what about the LU side
of
>   the
>   > >   river?  The DELU-LU boder proceeds from the
DELU-FR-LU
>   tripoint
>   > and
>   > >   then makes a turn to the right when it reaches a
monument. 
>   But
>   > the
>   > >   monument is on land.  Does this mean some of the land
is
>   condo
>   > >   territory?  Or is the monument a witness marker for the
>   triline?
>
>
>   just for the record
>   this question was first answered by peter in message 3151
>
>   & it was then first asked by jesper in message 3236
>
>   & finally mats promised to answer it in message 3281
>
>
>   but while seeking these original messages just to check my
>   sanity
>   i also chanced again on mats equally excellent messages
3312
>   & 3324
>   in which he reported
>   among many other choice details
>   the existence of 15 still extant condo islands
>
>   real condo land territory
>
>   places where living or native condoites might be sought
>
>   if indeed there are any such joint people living anywhere
>   since the demise of moresnet
>
>
>   so
>   since the defrlu island has been found to be uninhabited
>   can anyone identify or locate any of the remaining 14 delu
>   islands
>
>
>
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>             
>       
>       
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
>      
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>      
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.