Remarkable Elba Kramer:
http://www.jambase.com/search.asp?bandID=20737
They'll be jammin' starting in Jacksonville come
January.
For a pic of a Remarkable Elba Kramer member, go to:
http://www.jamcruise.com/jamcruise.html
Macromedia slideshow will load...the pics will cylce
through the bands who will be playing.
Is this US-CA at Saskatchewan - Manitoba - North
Dakota?
http://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/Prairies.jpg
79 k and climbing
--- aletheiak <
aletheiak@...> wrote:
>
http://www.elbaramalho.com.br/ela/fotos/foto36_gr.jpg
> oh la
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> marable was i ere i saw elba ramalho
> http://www.jazzozieri.com/LaranceMarable.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> on another hand
>
> remarkable was i ere i saw elba kramer
>
> but no foto available
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > hahaha
> > & good thing i asked if i understood it right
> > hahaha
> > for as usual i did assume i was the implied
> subject of your
> pals
> >
> > & so now at last their true meaning is fully
> revealed &
> interpreted
> >
> >
> > & i of all people can certainly understand how you
> may not like
> > the looks of certain punctuation & indeed
> congratulate you for
> > going as punk lite as you often do
> >
> >
> > er
> > i think i will leave inflating the part at the end
> entirely to you now
> > tho
> > hahaha
> >
> >
> > ps
> > but let me take this opportunity to thank you &
> joost too for
> > helping me read the russian scripts on those maps
> >
> >
> >
> > & thats about all i can think of stuffing in up
> here for now
> > except i believe we must be pushing about 60kb by
> now
> > which i think means we are already about 3
> quarters of the way
> > to your previous bp record
> >
> > so if everyone could just hang on for a while
> longer in the
> name
> > of science
> >
> > but maybe i will just add a little fresh air here
> while still on top
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > heh heh
> > > I use the commas for a couple of reasons. I
> didn't
> > > like the way the semicolons looked (as in the
> stark
> > > separations they caused). Also, if you put in a
> > > semicolon between clauses 2 and 3, most readers
> will
> > > assume the subject of the third clause is an
> implied
> > > "you" (second person). So with the commas, I
> wanted a
> > > newspaper headline style format. One could even
> put
> > > the second clause in parentheses before a comma
> before
> > > the third clause.
> > > I rob on; A. was able man ere 'Nam, Elba
> sawanobori.
> > > Meaning, first of all, that I am continuing this
> river
> > > climbing sport. But a man whose initial is A is
> > > currently not able to join me after having been
> to
> > > Vietnam and met Elba Ramalho (
> > > http://www.elbaramalho.com.br/ela/biografia.htm
> ).
> > > Check out the kickboxing maneuver in the photos
> > > section. I think an Elba sawanobori would have
> put me
> > > out of commission for a while, too. ;-) What
> was she
> > > in 'Nam for anyways?
> > > Large brainfart at message end.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > & still hearing no objection to our lengthy
> > > > excursion yet mike
> > > > i cant help wondering out loud anyway
> > > > re this your latest essay in literary
> > > > multidimensional reality
> > > > shouldnt those commas you inserted rather be
> > > > semicolons or
> > > > ellipses or even full stops
> > > > since your palindrome sentence
> > > > if i understand it rightly
> > > > is really a series of equally independent
> clauses
> > > >
> > > > but in any case it also led me to wonder if
> your
> > > > sawanobori
> > > > or my sawanabori for that matter
> > > > might also be susceptible to palindromic
> apotheosis
> > > > in a single
> > > > fully syntactical as well as plausibly
> semantical
> > > > sentence
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & indeed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > i rob on a wash sawanobori
> > > >
> > > > &or
> > > >
> > > > i rob an awash sawanabori
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > so you or i could actually do any of this
> robbing in
> > > > any dry wash
> > > > or we could actually go completely awash on
> the
> > > > awash river
> > > > for extra credit in multidimensional reality
> > > > like these women who are even doing the wash
> in it
> > > > too
> > > >
> http://home.wanadoo.nl/spaansen/popup/awash1.htm
> > > >
> > > > but as for all this brigandage
> > > > which is so uncharacteristic of us anyway
> > > > i believe it cant refer to any literal robbery
> > > > but must only be the technical & strictly
> > > > metaphorical term used
> > > > by enthusiasts of our great river eating sport
> as
> > > > they beg borrow
> > > > steal or purchase their way upstream in every
> way
> > > > they possibly
> > > > can
> > > > semper excelsior
> > > > as salmon & message stackers may also like to
> say
> > > >
> > > > so on that note i will cut to the chase & add
> a
> > > > little more air to the
> > > > bottom of this message
> > > >
> > > > please stand by
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> "aletheiak"
> > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > ahh very tastefully done as usual maestro
> > > > > & i was so hoping i wouldnt have to stack it
> all
> > > > by myself too
> > > > >
> > > > > yet according to my calculations
> > > > > we are still only about a third of the way
> up to
> > > > your existing
> > > > record
> > > > > height
> > > > >
> > > > > & already i cant help recalling how some
> members
> > > > maybe
> > > > didnt
> > > > > much appreciate getting their mailboxes so
> stuffed
> > > > etc last
> > > > time
> > > > > we tried this
> > > > > etc etc
> > > > >
> > > > > so anyway what do you think
> > > > >
> > > > > should we take a break & stop in for a drink
> at
> > > > the wasp bar
> > > > >
> > > > > or maybe we should create a special pal
> stacking &
> > > >
> > > > sawanabori
> > > > > net cafe side group
> > > > > so we could just try this on ourselves
> > > > > & then report our results here at bp only in
> > > > summary form
> > > > >
> > > > > is that what you are thinking
> > > > >
> > > > > but meanwhile i will just try to stuff in
> some
> > > > extra air at the
> > > > bottom
> > > > > to keep adding height while hopefully
> conserving
> > > > weight
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> Michael
> > > > Kaufman
> > > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > url minus ).
> > > > > >
> > > >
> http://www.designdirectory.co.uk/graphics2/efact.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@y...>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > I rob on, a Wasp bar of E-fact ensues,
> > > > > > > use US net cafe for a BP sawanobori.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Meaning:
> > > > > > > I continue my pilfering ways, and one of
> my
> > > > victims
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > graphic designer Daniel Blattler of
> London
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
(
http://www.designdirectory.co.uk/graphics2/efact.htm).
> > > > > > > Unfortunately, he can no longer afford
> to pay
> > > > for
> > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > website www.e-fact.com, so the White
> > > > Anglo-Saxon
> > > > > > > Protestant in charge shuts it down. The
> > > > proceeds of
> > > > > > > my heist were of course used back in the
> > > > United
> > > > > > > States
> > > > > > > at an internet cafe in order to read the
> > > > account of
> > > > > > > the Thames sawanobori on BoundaryPoint.
>
> > > > > > > (msg 14248 for the sawanobori spelling)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "aletheiak"
> > > > > > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > --- In
> BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > > "aletheiak"
> > > > > > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > --- In
> BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > Kaufman <
> > > > > > > > > > mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it is unknown if yahoo, who
> > > > effective
> > > > > > > > today
> > > > > > > > > > > upgraded free users' mailbox
> > > > capacities to a
> > > > > > > > whopping
> > > > > > > > > > > 100 megabytes, will carry this
> > > > generosity
> > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > yahoo groups and up our storage
> > > > capacity.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail -
> Send
> > > > 10MB
> > > > > > > > messages!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > well i guess one way for this to
> become
> > > > known
> > > > > > > > > > is for us to test the message
> stacking
> > > > > > > capacity
> > > > > > > > again
> > > > > > > > > > & compare our result against the
> last
> > > > time we
> > > > > > > > tried it
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > so for my part
> > > > > > > > > > i will pick up from where i just
> left
> > > > off
> > > > > > > > > > dropping 21 km back down the
> mekong
> > > > while
> > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > searching
> > > > > > > > for cnlamm
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > fortunately this vietnam era topo
> turned
> > > > up
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > in the nick of
> > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nf47-12/nf47_12c.ht
> > > > > > > > ml
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the elusive tripoint position can
> be
> > > > seen
> > > > > > > > clearly at lower left
> > > > > > > > > > at the dark black dashed line tee
> > > > junction
> > > > > > > > > > in the fat blue albeit unlabeled
> mekong
> > > > river
> > > > > > > > > > just below the confluence of a
> much t
> > > > hinner
> > > > > > > > blue but named
> > > > > > > > nan la ho
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > yet even more fortunately
> > > > > > > > > > this is just one of a complete set
> of
> > > > zoomable
> > > > > > > > laos topos
> > > > > > > > > >
> http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/laos.html
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > which means we have not only
> cnlamm now
> > > > but
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > 4 of the
> > > > > > > > other laos
> > > > > > > > > > tripoints to o
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > lammth or the golden triangle
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nf47-15/nf47_15h.ht
> > > > > > > > ml
> > > > > > > > > > at upper left just above ban sop
> ruak
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > khlath
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nd48-07/nd48_07e.
> > > > > > > > html
> > > > > > > > > > at upper right near phou denmuan g
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > khlavn at the tip of the the
> parrots
> > > > beak
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nd48-08/nd48_08c.
> > > > > > > > html
> > > > > > > > > > at middle right just northwest of
> > > > norking
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > & finally & most fortunately of
> all
> > > > > > > > > > cnlavn
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/n
> > > > > > > > f48-05/nf48_05a.html
> > > > > > > > > > at bottom right marked khoanglaxan
> 1865m
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > for what is so nice about this
> last one
> > > > is
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > we have actually
> > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > looking for it for over a year now
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/9805
> > > > > > > > > > & we get a muc h needed
> confirmation
> > > > here not
> > > > > > > > only of the
> > > > > > > > mountain peak
> > > > > > > > > > despite a slight spelling
> variation in
> > > > its
> > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > > but also of the geocoordinates
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > & what is so especially nice about
> the
> > > > whole
> > > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > is that it
> > > > > > > > gives all
> > > > > > > > > > the indochina tripoints in a
> single
> > > > resource
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > & curiously enough
> > > > > > > > > > just as all the land tripoints of
> north
> > > > > > > america
> > > > > > > > are guatemalan
> > > > > > > > > > so all those of southeast asia are
> > > > laotian
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > well thats about all i can think
> of
> > > > saying
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > this for now
> > > > > > > > > > except that all of vietnam &
> cambodia
> > > > plus a
> > > > > > > > good deal of
> > > > > > > > thailand are
> > > > > > > > > > also available at the same site
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > but other than for lammth
> > > > > > > > > > no pix have turned up yet for any
> of
> > > > these
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > so anyway maybe someone could add
> > > > something
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > keep this message
> > > > > > > > > > growing
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > as you know
> > > > > > > > > > it doesnt even have to be
> pertinent
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ok well fortunately i do have
> something
> > > > somewhat
> > > > > > > > pertinent
> > > > > > > > that i can add to this
> multidimensional try
> > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > it is worth noting
> > > > > > > > > already embraces magic pentacle
> circles of
> > > > both
> > > > > > > > traffic rotaries
> > > > > > > > & laotian tripoints
> > > > > > > > > even without the following pair of
> > > > original self
> > > > > > > > absorbed
> > > > > > > > palindromes specially penned for the
> > > > occasion
> > > > > > > > > complete with explanatory footnotes
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > al morfed
> > > > > > > > > anno loco
> > > > > > > > > no colonnade from laos
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > clearly it was aletheia herself who
> > > > morphed no
> > > > > > > > colonnade
> > > > > > > > > in this frankly too telescoped first
> try
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://community.webshots.com/photo/10537209/72406199Jem
> > > > > > > > PrS
> > > > > > > > > this being the only google image
> result
> > > > for laos
> > > > > > > > plus
> > > > > > > > colonnade
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & whether this colonnade has ever
> morphed
> > > > or
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > morphed
> > > > > > > > or not
> > > > > > > > > i cant say
> > > > > > > > > but al certainly didnt morf it
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & that crazy year when it happened
> or
> > > > rather
> > > > > > > didnt
> > > > > > > > > could only be anno loco 2004
> > > > > > > > > this year of our great bp refinement
> > > > > > > foreordained
> > > > > > > > ever since
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/12743
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > &
> > > > > > > > > 2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > a lot of nisus
> > > > > > > > > dr of faraway
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > say
> > > > > > > > > a war
> > > > > > > > > affords us info to laos
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > for this more elaborate & pertinent
> & i
> > > > think
> > > > > > > > funnier try to work
> > > > > > > > > i had to address myself as a
> > > > > > > > > doctor of faraway
> > > > > > > > > & thus to confer our second honorary
> bp
> > > > doctoral
> > > > > > > > degree
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > so now you can call me doc too
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the war was of course the vietnam
> conflict
> > > > > > > > > which is the only reason these maps
> even
> > > > exist
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & for nisus
> > > > > > > > > please see
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/nisus
> > > > > > > > > evidently not just referring to that
> war
> > > > effort
> > > > > > > > > but comparing to it my own
> aggressive yet
> > > > > > > entirely
> > > > > > > > peaceful
> > > > > > > > strivings
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > which raises the question
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > since we may have all these extra
> > > > megabytes to
> > > > > > > > burn today
> > > > > > > > anyway
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > could just playing ecstatically
> enough
> > > > redeem
> > > > > > > war
> > > > > > > > & similar
> > > > > > > > stupidity
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & could homo ludens be the one to
> save
> > > > homo
> > > > > > > > sapiens from
> > > > > > > > himself
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > remember
> > > > > > > > > tho this stacking try
> > > > > > > > > into the great unknown
> > > > > > > > > is more about length than quality or
> > > > pertinency
> > > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > the latter qualities are not
> necessarily
> > > > > > > precluded
> > > > > > > > by it
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & just to keep this all in school
> > > > > > > > > i will exit all these laotian
> traffic
> > > > circles at
> > > > > > > > the next opportunity
> > > > > > > > > & head directly to the nearest
> nonlaotian
> > > > > > > tripoint
> > > > > > > > > if indeed i can find it while there
> is
> > > > still any
> > > > > > > > room left in this
> > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > as you probably realized
> > > > > > > > this could only have been cninmm
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the china indian myanmar tripoint
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > our 5th virgin in a row now
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > nor is she very likely to be found by
> anyone
> > > > > > > > tho i confess i was hoping someone
> might
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > preceded me
> > > > > > > > there with the goods
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but it appears this baby may actually
> be as
> > > > > > > unknown
> > > > > > > > as they
> > > > > > > > come
> > > > > > > > & so very pertinent to the present try
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for starters please consider the
> strange
> > > > final
> > > > > > > > paragraph on page
> > > > > > > > 10 here
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS042.pdf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > to which i can add
> > > > > > > > that my best atlas shows about 100km
> of
> > > > separation
> > > > > > > > between
> > > > > > > > the extreme positions
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & also
> > > > > > > > that i have the distinct impression
> that the
> > > > > > > ongoing
> > > > > > > > cnin border
> > > > > > > > talks
> > > > > > > > having already disposed of tibet &
> sikkim on
> > > > a
> > > > > > > quid
> > > > > > > > pro quo
> > > > > > > > basis
> > > > > > > > are heading in the direction of
> recognizing
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > indian position
> > > > > > > > aka the the mcmahon line
> > > > > > > > here in arunachal pradesh
> > > > > > > > in exchange for recognizing the
> chinese line
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > control at aksai
> > > > > > > > chin in sinkiang
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so i would guess that the northernmost
> of
> > > > the 3
> > > > > > > > possible tripoint
> > > > > > > > positions mentioned by the ibs
> > > > > > > > situated in fact at a watershed
> trijunction
> > > > just
> > > > > > > > north of diphu pass
> > > > > > > > is by far the greatest probability
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > as my computer is behaving strangely
> > > > > > > > let me just hope & try to post this
> much now
> > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > losing it
> > > > > > > > & to continue later
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > since thats the idea anyway
> > > > > > > > right
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB
> free
> > > > storage!
> > > > > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it
> out!
> > > > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other
> providers!
> > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail