Subject: unknown again was cninmm was Re: (unknown) etc
Date: Jun 27, 2004 @ 22:05
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


http://www.elbaramalho.com.br/ela/fotos/foto36_gr.jpg
oh la












marable was i ere i saw elba ramalho
http://www.jazzozieri.com/LaranceMarable.htm



































































































































































on another hand

remarkable was i ere i saw elba kramer

but no foto available










--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
<aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> hahaha
> & good thing i asked if i understood it right
> hahaha
> for as usual i did assume i was the implied subject of your
pals
>
> & so now at last their true meaning is fully revealed &
interpreted
>
>
> & i of all people can certainly understand how you may not like
> the looks of certain punctuation & indeed congratulate you for
> going as punk lite as you often do
>
>
> er
> i think i will leave inflating the part at the end entirely to you now
> tho
> hahaha
>
>
> ps
> but let me take this opportunity to thank you & joost too for
> helping me read the russian scripts on those maps
>
>
>
> & thats about all i can think of stuffing in up here for now
> except i believe we must be pushing about 60kb by now
> which i think means we are already about 3 quarters of the way
> to your previous bp record
>
> so if everyone could just hang on for a while longer in the
name
> of science
>
> but maybe i will just add a little fresh air here while still on top
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
> <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > heh heh
> > I use the commas for a couple of reasons. I didn't
> > like the way the semicolons looked (as in the stark
> > separations they caused). Also, if you put in a
> > semicolon between clauses 2 and 3, most readers will
> > assume the subject of the third clause is an implied
> > "you" (second person). So with the commas, I wanted a
> > newspaper headline style format. One could even put
> > the second clause in parentheses before a comma before
> > the third clause.
> > I rob on; A. was able man ere 'Nam, Elba sawanobori.
> > Meaning, first of all, that I am continuing this river
> > climbing sport. But a man whose initial is A is
> > currently not able to join me after having been to
> > Vietnam and met Elba Ramalho (
> > http://www.elbaramalho.com.br/ela/biografia.htm ).
> > Check out the kickboxing maneuver in the photos
> > section. I think an Elba sawanobori would have put me
> > out of commission for a while, too. ;-) What was she
> > in 'Nam for anyways?
> > Large brainfart at message end.
> >
> >
> > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > & still hearing no objection to our lengthy
> > > excursion yet mike
> > > i cant help wondering out loud anyway
> > > re this your latest essay in literary
> > > multidimensional reality
> > > shouldnt those commas you inserted rather be
> > > semicolons or
> > > ellipses or even full stops
> > > since your palindrome sentence
> > > if i understand it rightly
> > > is really a series of equally independent clauses
> > >
> > > but in any case it also led me to wonder if your
> > > sawanobori
> > > or my sawanabori for that matter
> > > might also be susceptible to palindromic apotheosis
> > > in a single
> > > fully syntactical as well as plausibly semantical
> > > sentence
> > >
> > >
> > > & indeed
> > >
> > >
> > > i rob on a wash sawanobori
> > >
> > > &or
> > >
> > > i rob an awash sawanabori
> > >
> > >
> > > so you or i could actually do any of this robbing in
> > > any dry wash
> > > or we could actually go completely awash on the
> > > awash river
> > > for extra credit in multidimensional reality
> > > like these women who are even doing the wash in it
> > > too
> > > http://home.wanadoo.nl/spaansen/popup/awash1.htm
> > >
> > > but as for all this brigandage
> > > which is so uncharacteristic of us anyway
> > > i believe it cant refer to any literal robbery
> > > but must only be the technical & strictly
> > > metaphorical term used
> > > by enthusiasts of our great river eating sport as
> > > they beg borrow
> > > steal or purchase their way upstream in every way
> > > they possibly
> > > can
> > > semper excelsior
> > > as salmon & message stackers may also like to say
> > >
> > > so on that note i will cut to the chase & add a
> > > little more air to the
> > > bottom of this message
> > >
> > > please stand by
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > ahh very tastefully done as usual maestro
> > > > & i was so hoping i wouldnt have to stack it all
> > > by myself too
> > > >
> > > > yet according to my calculations
> > > > we are still only about a third of the way up to
> > > your existing
> > > record
> > > > height
> > > >
> > > > & already i cant help recalling how some members
> > > maybe
> > > didnt
> > > > much appreciate getting their mailboxes so stuffed
> > > etc last
> > > time
> > > > we tried this
> > > > etc etc
> > > >
> > > > so anyway what do you think
> > > >
> > > > should we take a break & stop in for a drink at
> > > the wasp bar
> > > >
> > > > or maybe we should create a special pal stacking &
> > >
> > > sawanabori
> > > > net cafe side group
> > > > so we could just try this on ourselves
> > > > & then report our results here at bp only in
> > > summary form
> > > >
> > > > is that what you are thinking
> > > >
> > > > but meanwhile i will just try to stuff in some
> > > extra air at the
> > > bottom
> > > > to keep adding height while hopefully conserving
> > > weight
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> > > Kaufman
> > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > url minus ).
> > > > >
> > > http://www.designdirectory.co.uk/graphics2/efact.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > I rob on, a Wasp bar of E-fact ensues,
> > > > > > use US net cafe for a BP sawanobori.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Meaning:
> > > > > > I continue my pilfering ways, and one of my
> > > victims
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > graphic designer Daniel Blattler of London
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > (http://www.designdirectory.co.uk/graphics2/efact.htm).
> > > > > > Unfortunately, he can no longer afford to pay
> > > for
> > > > > > his
> > > > > > website www.e-fact.com, so the White
> > > Anglo-Saxon
> > > > > > Protestant in charge shuts it down. The
> > > proceeds of
> > > > > > my heist were of course used back in the
> > > United
> > > > > > States
> > > > > > at an internet cafe in order to read the
> > > account of
> > > > > > the Thames sawanobori on BoundaryPoint.
> > > > > > (msg 14248 for the sawanobori spelling)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > "aletheiak"
> > > > > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > "aletheiak"
> > > > > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > Michael
> > > > > > > Kaufman <
> > > > > > > > > mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, it is unknown if yahoo, who
> > > effective
> > > > > > > today
> > > > > > > > > > upgraded free users' mailbox
> > > capacities to a
> > > > > > > whopping
> > > > > > > > > > 100 megabytes, will carry this
> > > generosity
> > > > > > over
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > yahoo groups and up our storage
> > > capacity.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send
> > > 10MB
> > > > > > > messages!
> > > > > > > > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > well i guess one way for this to become
> > > known
> > > > > > > > > is for us to test the message stacking
> > > > > > capacity
> > > > > > > again
> > > > > > > > > & compare our result against the last
> > > time we
> > > > > > > tried it
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > so for my part
> > > > > > > > > i will pick up from where i just left
> > > off
> > > > > > > > > dropping 21 km back down the mekong
> > > while
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > > searching
> > > > > > > for cnlamm
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > fortunately this vietnam era topo turned
> > > up
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > in the nick of
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nf47-12/nf47_12c.ht
> > > > > > > ml
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the elusive tripoint position can be
> > > seen
> > > > > > > clearly at lower left
> > > > > > > > > at the dark black dashed line tee
> > > junction
> > > > > > > > > in the fat blue albeit unlabeled mekong
> > > river
> > > > > > > > > just below the confluence of a much t
> > > hinner
> > > > > > > blue but named
> > > > > > > nan la ho
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > yet even more fortunately
> > > > > > > > > this is just one of a complete set of
> > > zoomable
> > > > > > > laos topos
> > > > > > > > > http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/laos.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > which means we have not only cnlamm now
> > > but
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > 4 of the
> > > > > > > other laos
> > > > > > > > > tripoints to o
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > lammth or the golden triangle
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nf47-15/nf47_15h.ht
> > > > > > > ml
> > > > > > > > > at upper left just above ban sop ruak
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > khlath
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nd48-07/nd48_07e.
> > > > > > > html
> > > > > > > > > at upper right near phou denmuan g
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > khlavn at the tip of the the parrots
> > > beak
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/nd48-08/nd48_08c.
> > > > > > > html
> > > > > > > > > at middle right just northwest of
> > > norking
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & finally & most fortunately of all
> > > > > > > > > cnlavn
> > > > > > > > >
> > > http://www.nexus.net/~911gfx/vietnam/maps/n
> > > > > > > f48-05/nf48_05a.html
> > > > > > > > > at bottom right marked khoanglaxan 1865m
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > for what is so nice about this last one
> > > is
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > we have actually
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > looking for it for over a year now
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/9805
> > > > > > > > > & we get a muc h needed confirmation
> > > here not
> > > > > > > only of the
> > > > > > > mountain peak
> > > > > > > > > despite a slight spelling variation in
> > > its
> > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > but also of the geocoordinates
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & what is so especially nice about the
> > > whole
> > > > > > set
> > > > > > > is that it
> > > > > > > gives all
> > > > > > > > > the indochina tripoints in a single
> > > resource
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > & curiously enough
> > > > > > > > > just as all the land tripoints of north
> > > > > > america
> > > > > > > are guatemalan
> > > > > > > > > so all those of southeast asia are
> > > laotian
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > well thats about all i can think of
> > > saying
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > this for now
> > > > > > > > > except that all of vietnam & cambodia
> > > plus a
> > > > > > > good deal of
> > > > > > > thailand are
> > > > > > > > > also available at the same site
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > but other than for lammth
> > > > > > > > > no pix have turned up yet for any of
> > > these
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > so anyway maybe someone could add
> > > something
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > keep this message
> > > > > > > > > growing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > as you know
> > > > > > > > > it doesnt even have to be pertinent
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ok well fortunately i do have something
> > > somewhat
> > > > > > > pertinent
> > > > > > > that i can add to this multidimensional try
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > it is worth noting
> > > > > > > > already embraces magic pentacle circles of
> > > both
> > > > > > > traffic rotaries
> > > > > > > & laotian tripoints
> > > > > > > > even without the following pair of
> > > original self
> > > > > > > absorbed
> > > > > > > palindromes specially penned for the
> > > occasion
> > > > > > > > complete with explanatory footnotes
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > al morfed
> > > > > > > > anno loco
> > > > > > > > no colonnade from laos
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > clearly it was aletheia herself who
> > > morphed no
> > > > > > > colonnade
> > > > > > > > in this frankly too telescoped first try
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://community.webshots.com/photo/10537209/72406199Jem
> > > > > > > PrS
> > > > > > > > this being the only google image result
> > > for laos
> > > > > > > plus
> > > > > > > colonnade
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & whether this colonnade has ever morphed
> > > or
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > morphed
> > > > > > > or not
> > > > > > > > i cant say
> > > > > > > > but al certainly didnt morf it
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & that crazy year when it happened or
> > > rather
> > > > > > didnt
> > > > > > > > could only be anno loco 2004
> > > > > > > > this year of our great bp refinement
> > > > > > foreordained
> > > > > > > ever since
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/12743
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > &
> > > > > > > > 2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > a lot of nisus
> > > > > > > > dr of faraway
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > say
> > > > > > > > a war
> > > > > > > > affords us info to laos
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for this more elaborate & pertinent & i
> > > think
> > > > > > > funnier try to work
> > > > > > > > i had to address myself as a
> > > > > > > > doctor of faraway
> > > > > > > > & thus to confer our second honorary bp
> > > doctoral
> > > > > > > degree
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so now you can call me doc too
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the war was of course the vietnam conflict
> > > > > > > > which is the only reason these maps even
> > > exist
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & for nisus
> > > > > > > > please see
> > > > > > > >
> > > http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/nisus
> > > > > > > > evidently not just referring to that war
> > > effort
> > > > > > > > but comparing to it my own aggressive yet
> > > > > > entirely
> > > > > > > peaceful
> > > > > > > strivings
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > which raises the question
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > since we may have all these extra
> > > megabytes to
> > > > > > > burn today
> > > > > > > anyway
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > could just playing ecstatically enough
> > > redeem
> > > > > > war
> > > > > > > & similar
> > > > > > > stupidity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & could homo ludens be the one to save
> > > homo
> > > > > > > sapiens from
> > > > > > > himself
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > remember
> > > > > > > > tho this stacking try
> > > > > > > > into the great unknown
> > > > > > > > is more about length than quality or
> > > pertinency
> > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > the latter qualities are not necessarily
> > > > > > precluded
> > > > > > > by it
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & just to keep this all in school
> > > > > > > > i will exit all these laotian traffic
> > > circles at
> > > > > > > the next opportunity
> > > > > > > > & head directly to the nearest nonlaotian
> > > > > > tripoint
> > > > > > > > if indeed i can find it while there is
> > > still any
> > > > > > > room left in this
> > > > > > > message
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > as you probably realized
> > > > > > > this could only have been cninmm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the china indian myanmar tripoint
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > our 5th virgin in a row now
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > nor is she very likely to be found by anyone
> > > > > > > tho i confess i was hoping someone might
> > > have
> > > > > > > preceded me
> > > > > > > there with the goods
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but it appears this baby may actually be as
> > > > > > unknown
> > > > > > > as they
> > > > > > > come
> > > > > > > & so very pertinent to the present try
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > for starters please consider the strange
> > > final
> > > > > > > paragraph on page
> > > > > > > 10 here
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS042.pdf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > to which i can add
> > > > > > > that my best atlas shows about 100km of
> > > separation
> > > > > > > between
> > > > > > > the extreme positions
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > & also
> > > > > > > that i have the distinct impression that the
> > > > > > ongoing
> > > > > > > cnin border
> > > > > > > talks
> > > > > > > having already disposed of tibet & sikkim on
> > > a
> > > > > > quid
> > > > > > > pro quo
> > > > > > > basis
> > > > > > > are heading in the direction of recognizing
> > > the
> > > > > > > indian position
> > > > > > > aka the the mcmahon line
> > > > > > > here in arunachal pradesh
> > > > > > > in exchange for recognizing the chinese line
> > > of
> > > > > > > control at aksai
> > > > > > > chin in sinkiang
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > so i would guess that the northernmost of
> > > the 3
> > > > > > > possible tripoint
> > > > > > > positions mentioned by the ibs
> > > > > > > situated in fact at a watershed trijunction
> > > just
> > > > > > > north of diphu pass
> > > > > > > is by far the greatest probability
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > as my computer is behaving strangely
> > > > > > > let me just hope & try to post this much now
> > > > > > before
> > > > > > > losing it
> > > > > > > & to continue later
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > since thats the idea anyway
> > > > > > > right
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free
> > > storage!
> > > > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
> > > > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail