ok 4 u
objective truth for me please if possible
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> well.
>
> It's very simple in my terms: x marks the spot.
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "m06079" <barbaria_longa@h...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:56 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Jungholz - additional info on
markers!
>
>
> you bet
>
> a short resume
>
>
> & i apologize once again if things are not always as simple
here
> as we may have liked them to be
>
> for after all
> we are often talking about some rather complicated stuff
> & especially so when we are really pursuing our actual bp topic
> as we are doing now
>
> & so please do help me also
> by asking as specifically as possible whenever you can
> positively identify any areas of uncertainty or puzzlement etc in
> what i am saying
>
>
> but in a nutshell
> if you will bring a reliable tape measure to jungholz
> then you can measure off the 261 centimeter distance that is
> shown on the diagram you posted
> running from the kt kataster stone to marker 110
> & perhaps running specifically to the cross point depicted on
> marker 110
> for we dont really know that yet
>
> & thus you can perform a first crude check on whether the
> crossing point of this symbolic cross is indeed as accurate a
> locator of the actual border cross point as several of us seem
to
> believe it is
>
> & if your measurement reaches this cross point exactly
> then you will most probably have confirmed our belief
> or will have greatly buttressed it
> until further measurements can be made from the other
markers
>
> but such measurements would require better equipment
> so lets not even think about that yet
>
> for once you have found in this simple way that you have most
> probably arrived at the correct square centimeter
> further checks might prove academic anyway
>
> & then too you can look or probe further still
> into the recessed area
> for the most central &or deepest pinpoint within it
>
> & this would advance your accuracy from the merely
centimetric
> to the millimetric level
>
> & that will probably be the best anyone will ever do there
>
>
> but if your measurement does not exactly coincide with this
> cross point
> then we have more to do here
> involving several more & longer measurements
> as also shown on your diagram
> before we can find & verify the true border crossing point
>
> & that is the true value to us of all these indirect supporting
> markers
>
>
> now i hope that at least helps
> & just to keep it short
> i wont say more unless there is still something you dont get
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > A short resume please....
> >
> > Jesper
> > .....................
> > all in boss
> >
> > & happily we still do have somewhere to go & grow here
> >
> > for you have called the game on our most excellent adventure
> > which is
> > to corroborate the square centimeter of absolute truth
> > & possibly even to find the square millimeter of absolute truth
> > now that you have shown how we can definitely make such
> tries
> >
> >
> > for thus far
> > our journey to the truth has led us to merely assume &
imagine
> > that the exact boundary crossing point is as indicated by the
> > cross symbol on marker 110
> >
> > & this despite its multiple eccentricities
> >
> >
> > but now the pursuit can be positively advanced
> > by vermessungsstein or versicherungsstein or kataster
> > for it is all the same to us in light of the trigonometric
> exactitudes
> > we now have for them all
> > thanx to you
> > at the bottom of
> > http://tinyurl.com/ypolb
> >
> >
> > most poignantly & specifically
> > for starters
> > the fact that the reference point on the kt rock is exactly 261
> > centimeters from the absolute truth of the quadripoint
> > yikes
> >
> >
> > so just bring a rigid tape measure & see for yourself &
> ourselves
> > whether a 261 centimeter arc centered on the kt center
actually
> > does or actually does not sweep the exact center of the cross
> > symbol on marker 110
> >
> > & if it does
> > then our assumption is at least greatly corroborated
> >
> > & all that would remain for the present expedition to do is to
> pay
> > the most acupunctural visit it can to that symbolic crosshairs
> >
> > which may mean feeling your way to it with a pointier object
> than
> > your finger or eyeball
> > in such a dark & shadowy groove or valley
> >
> > for we dont know exactly whats in there
> > where these symbolic thalwegs meet
> > unless maybe mats can answer this flat out from memory
> >
> >
> > but anyway
> > precisely therein would lie the additional quantum leap
> between
> > what is now only a hopefully square centimeter of truth &
what
> > could prove to be an utterly real square millimeter of truth
> >
> > & both these advances over our present knowlege may
actually
> > emerge here under your guidance
> >
> > & they would be subject only to the full trigonometric check
that
> > could be made by a later & better equipped expedition
> > since it is always nice to leave at least something undone for
> > future generations anyway
> > so they too can say
> > it seems like we will never get finished with this great place
> >
> > however even if we do finish here this time in class aa
> > happily we still have the far more challenging baarle &
bengali
> > border crosses in our future anyway
> >
> > >
> > > all yours
> > >
> > > Peter H.
> > >
> > >
> > > de bedste hilsener
> > > best regards
> > > mit freundlichen Grüssen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links