Subject: Re: American ghost tripoints
Date: Feb 08, 2004 @ 14:03
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> On third reading, I now understand your question (I think).van zandt can & evidently does say & conclude that this is the correct
>
> I don't know which treaty, whether, ESGB or GBUS, was signed earlier on
> September 3, 1783, nor how many minutes apart they were. Falconer mentions EGGB
> and GBUS in adjacent paragraphs in that order, but who can say whether he
> mentioned them chronologically?
>
> In one order, you get a momentary tripoint, in the other, you don't!
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@m...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 8:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: American ghost tripoints
>
>
> > Mike wrote:
> >
> > > ok but i meant the much smaller unknown number of days between the gbus
> > > consummation of 3 sept 1783 & the esgb cession on a subsequent but to
> > > me still unknown date in 1783
> >
> > I don't know when the provisional GBUS treaty of 1783 was ratified and
> > effective, but the ESGB treaty by which Britain ceded the Floridas to Spain
> was
> > signed on the same day as the definitive GBUS treaty, that being September 3,
> > 1783. This is according to Thomas Falconer in ON THE DISCOVERY OF THE
> > MISSISSIPPI, AND ON THE SOUTH-WESTERN, OREGON, AND NORTH-WESTERN BOUNDARY OF
> THE
> > UNITED STATES (London: Samuel Clark, 1844).
> >
> > Lowell G. McManus
> > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >