Subject: Re: Dry Tortugas
Date: Dec 08, 2003 @ 00:47
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


thanx
thats much better

& so why would you suppose the cut lines run both ways now

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I've cut out the mounting clutter and re-titled the thread.
>
> You wrote:
>
> > thanx very much for this choice morsel in any case
> > & you can see here that the usgs still doesnt have it right
> > http://topozone.com/map.asp?lat=24.66472&lon=-82.85556
> > but draws the line between the 3nm & 9nm regimes
> > on an east west basis rather than the north south line you specify
> > something i had always suspected they had done arbitrarily
> > but couldnt prove until now
>
> Those TopoZone links never work right for me. After 15 minutes of
trying to get
> to something recognizable from the various settings at the linked
URL, I gave up
> and went to TerraServer. There I easily found the big picture on
the Dry
> Tortugas at http://tinyurl.com/y5w2 .
>
> Here you can see that this 1989 map has both east-west and north-
south
> components to the division between the different Gulf and the
Atlantic state
> waters regimes. Admittedly, the source from which I took the
description that I
> gave was rather simplistic. My point and that of the source was
more that the
> Submerged Lands Act did trump the pre-existing state claims in the
Atlantic
> (however defined). I will endeavor to research the actual SCOTUS
decision and
> render a full report.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA