Subject: Re: Four Color Maps<br/>
Date: Dec 08, 2003 @ 00:44<br/>
Author: m06079 (&quot;m06079&quot; &lt;barbaria_longa@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="12562.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="12569.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic12527.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="12563.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="12565.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-518255205">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; <br/>
&lt;mcmanus71496@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; See below.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
&gt; From: &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt;<br/>
&gt; To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
&gt; Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 12:47 PM<br/>
&gt; Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Four Color Maps<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot;<br/>
&gt; &gt; &lt;mcmanus71496@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; Belatedly, I have now reviewed that particular part of Van <br/>
 </span></blockquote>Zandt&#39;s<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; BUS&SS.<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; While I can agree that Pacific coastal states can extend their<br/>
&gt; &gt; territorial<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; waters no more than 3 nautical miles into the Pacific, I would<br/>
&gt; &gt; argue that the<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; waters around Point Roberts are not at all the Pacific Ocean,<br/>
&gt; &gt;<br/>
&gt; &gt; i would not argue<br/>
&gt; &gt; but i am pretty sure the sla actually says<br/>
&gt; &gt; 3nm from coasts<br/>
&gt; &gt; & doesnt necessarily specify oceanic waters nor distinguish <br/>
 </span></blockquote>internal<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; ones from them<br/>
&gt; &gt; & i believe the supremes have basically signed off on this law too<br/>
&gt; &gt; as early as 1954<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; You are correct that is does say coasts, but coastlines (from which <br/>
 </span></blockquote>the three<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; miles of state waters are measured) have been interpreted by the <br/>
 </span></blockquote>Supremes as<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; composed of the shores of oceans and the closing lines of internal <br/>
 </span></blockquote>waters.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; Lowell G. McManus<br/>
&gt; Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>ok as i say <br/>
hahahaha<br/>
you & all the maps could well be right<br/>
<br/>
the 3nm regime never enters georgia or juan de fuca strait<br/>
even tho american waters in both their entrances as well as in the <br/>
waters between them easily clear 3nm much of the way round<br/>
<br/>
& this purely as a matter of the closing lines of historic bays<br/>
<br/>
very neat<br/>
<br/>
neat enough to buy on the spot in fact & change my opinion<br/>
<br/>
however<br/>
usgs is curiously & conspicuously missing the 3nm line everywhere <br/>
around cape flattery <br/>
the critical turning & changing point if any<br/>
& everywhere inland of it<br/>
& indeed the topos seem to duck the issue most poignantly<br/>
tho they are crystal clear & state of the art punctilious about these <br/>
delineations all around oruswa for example<br/>
<br/>
so clearly something remains unresolved in reality here rather than <br/>
only in my mind<br/>
<br/>
but i grant there is ample evidence you all may well be right<br/>
or may be proved right in a real contest<br/>
& it was good of you to call me on my assertion that there is a known <br/>
case of an inland exclave<br/>
<br/>
i should have said there is believed to be such a case</div>