wow nice
tho it was exactly true too
& i see they cleaned up bjneng too in the same revision
& what fun to see we actually caught & corrected not just 1 but
both of their mistakes for them too
think about how great that is
& another mistake
i just realized
t h e y
are the company
oops
rather than the fudge factory as i also claimed offcourse below
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> Not exactly true:
>
> This is the current version:
>
> http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/2070.html
>
> And offcourse cadk is there!
>
> Jesper
> ---
> Borderbase - your online guide to international borders
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:12 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundary disputes
>
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Artur Kroc
<kroc@i...>
> > wrote:
> > > http://geoinfo.amu.edu.pl/wpk/factbook/fields/2070.html
> >
> > nice shooting artur
> >
> > this is practically the entire pandemonium in a single scatter
> > shot of our global pandominium
> >
> > & nice to see hans island on dedk missing from the list too
> > tho i could think of no other complete omission in the entire
> > world
> >
> >
> > moreover
> > since many of these disputes & nondisputes do or could
involve
> > the tripoints
> > such as arbruy brgyve etc etc etc
> > i was most interested to also find only a single tripoint in the
> > entire world actually mentioned here by name
> > namely benin niger nigeria our bjneng
> > & mentioned 3 times of course or once under each country
> >
> > yet the state department kind of blew it after all
> > since they mention this point only to make the point that it is
> > undemarcated
> > while we already know from brownlie that it stands on the
> > median line of a river
> > at its intersection with a cairn monumented geodetic line
> > & thus would be better characterized not as any sort of a
dispute
> > at all but as a perfectly normal indirectly demarcated wetpoint
> >
> > so with those 2 really remarkable exceptions
> > i think you probably have complete coverage of the borders
here
> > & complete oversight of the tripoints
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >