Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundary disputes
Date: Oct 06, 2003 @ 19:50
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Not exactly true:

This is the current version:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/2070.html

And offcourse cadk is there!

Jesper
---
Borderbase - your online guide to international borders
http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase



----- Original Message -----
From: "acroorca2002" <orc@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundary disputes


> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Artur Kroc <kroc@i...>
> wrote:
> > http://geoinfo.amu.edu.pl/wpk/factbook/fields/2070.html
>
> nice shooting artur
>
> this is practically the entire pandemonium in a single scatter
> shot of our global pandominium
>
> & nice to see hans island on dedk missing from the list too
> tho i could think of no other complete omission in the entire
> world
>
>
> moreover
> since many of these disputes & nondisputes do or could involve
> the tripoints
> such as arbruy brgyve etc etc etc
> i was most interested to also find only a single tripoint in the
> entire world actually mentioned here by name
> namely benin niger nigeria our bjneng
> & mentioned 3 times of course or once under each country
>
> yet the state department kind of blew it after all
> since they mention this point only to make the point that it is
> undemarcated
> while we already know from brownlie that it stands on the
> median line of a river
> at its intersection with a cairn monumented geodetic line
> & thus would be better characterized not as any sort of a dispute
> at all but as a perfectly normal indirectly demarcated wetpoint
>
> so with those 2 really remarkable exceptions
> i think you probably have complete coverage of the borders here
> & complete oversight of the tripoints
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>