Subject: Re: Boundary disputes
Date: Oct 06, 2003 @ 16:17
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002"
<orc@o...> wrote:
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Artur Kroc <kroc@i...>
> wrote:
> > http://geoinfo.amu.edu.pl/wpk/factbook/fields/2070.html
>
> nice shooting artur
>
> this is practically the entire pandemonium in a single scatter
> shot of our global pandominium
>
> & nice to see hans island on dedk missing from the list too

excuse me but isnt hans island on cadk rather than dedk
hahaha
no wonder it is missing from the list
yikes

but still it really is missing from the list
even under canada where it belongs
& it does seriously appear to be unique that way

but again
given the vagueness & inconsistency of the parameters
i suppose others cases of who knows what else may yet be
found

> tho i could think of no other complete omission in the entire
> world
>
>
> moreover
> since many of these disputes & nondisputes do or could
involve
> the tripoints
> such as arbruy brgyve etc etc etc
> i was most interested to also find only a single tripoint in the
> entire world actually mentioned here by name
> namely benin niger nigeria our bjneng
> & mentioned 3 times of course or once under each country
>
> yet the state department kind of blew it after all
> since they mention this point only to make the point that it is
> undemarcated
> while we already know from brownlie that it stands on the
> median line of a river
> at its intersection with a cairn monumented geodetic line
> & thus would be better characterized not as any sort of a
dispute
> at all but as a perfectly normal indirectly demarcated wetpoint
>
> so with those 2 really remarkable exceptions
> i think you probably have complete coverage of the borders
here
> & complete oversight of the tripoints