Subject: Re: river banks and island boundaries
Date: Oct 06, 2003 @ 04:45
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Hi, Brendan,Protectorate
>
> Try:
> New Jersey v. Delaware, 291 US 361-85 (in the 1930s)
> Webster-Ashburton Treaty, US-Canada, Aug 8, 1842
> GB-NL Convention of Mar 26, 1928 re: Borneo under British
> and Netherlands territory on the island.issue) Hindson
> Alabama v. Georgia, 23 How 515, May 1, 1860 & (on same
> v. Ashby, J.P., Vol 60 (1896), p. 487 and Vermont v. New Yorkborder up
> (interpreting King of England decision of Jul 20, 1764 re:
> to 45-degrees lat in a bay.possessions on the
>
> Try also, with specific reference to islands in rivers:
> GB-Portugal Agmt of Nov 6-30, 1911 re border two
> Ruo and Shure rivers, BFSP, Vol 104, p 1941913.
> Soviet-Polish treaty of 15Feb61 UNTS v420 p161
> Geogria v So Carolina 217 US 516 (1919-22)
> Russia-Turkey Treaty of Adrianople (date unk)
> Re: change of sovereignty of islands btw Turkey-Persia Nov 4,
> Grover Cleveland award Feb 5, 1895 relating to theArgentina-Brazil
> border overing 53 islands in the Uurugay river and over 5islands in
> the Iguazu river btw. Brazil and Argentina.covering what
> Austria-Sardo (Modena) Boundary treaty of Aug 8, 1849,
> happens in that case when two islands each under separatesovereignty
> in a border river join.(extension of a
> Louisiana v. Mississippi, US Supreme Court, 202 U.S. 1
> border to the sea across an island).Press 1940,
> See also Boggs, International Boundaries, Columbia Univ
> page 191.hahahahaha
> Hope these are good leads.arrangements. Thus,
>
> Also, in the matter of the D-Lux condo, the 1816 treaty between
> Prussia and NL provided that their borders would generally be
> condominiums UNLESS another treaty provided other
> it may be that the D-Lux condo is a "holdover" - a stretch of riverVersailles
> for which no other arrangements were ever made, or for which
> arrangements were made and then reversed, possibly by the
> Treaty when it didn't undid provisions of later treaties (i.e., 1847conjecture,
> and newer) but not of the earlier 1816 treaty. A lot of
> but possible.<bwhyte@u...> wrote:
>
> Regards
>
> Len
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Brendan Whyte
> > A recent query from a colleague.following matters:
> >
> > I am wondering whether anyone can assist me with the
> >of a given
> > (1) Reference to legal or arbitral decisions dealing with the
> > disposition of
> > islands where, for example, a State's territory is defined as
> including all
> > islands (but, perhaps, not waters) to the, say, west or south
> > meridian of longitude or parallel of latitude; and the islandsin
> questionrivers; as
> > "straddle" the meridian or parallel.
> >
> > (2) A list of all those international (and, if possible, in the
> case of
> > federations, interstate) boundaries located on the banks of
> > distinct from midlines, etc.
> >
> > Responses to me please,
> > thanks
> > Brendan