Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: SMOM map?<br/>
Date: Jul 10, 2003 @ 21:34<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="10941.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10946.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic10932.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="10942.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10944.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1522041630">Acroorca wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; excuse me for tho i agree with your conclusion & you have<br/>
&gt; indeed responded on point to the question up to a point<br/>
&gt; this is still not a sufficient explanation of sovereignty.............<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I don&#39;t disagree with what you have written.  I was endeavoring to explain the<br/>
rationale for SMOM&#39;s recognized sovereignty, not the concept of sovereignty in<br/>
general.<br/>
<br/>
Lowell</div>