Subject: Re: The IBWC speaks!!!<br/>
Date: Jul 03, 2003 @ 00:31<br/>
Author: L. A. Nadybal (&quot;L. A. Nadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="10815.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10817.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic10809.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="10815.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10817.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-761951890">Well, then, assuming nothing other than vertical sovereignty exists,<br/>
in this case we seem to have a diagram of the border that looks like so:<br/>
<br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
   U S A        |   river   |<br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
                |     :     |   M E X I C O<br/>
                |     :     | <br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
       .........|......     |    <br/>
       :        |           |<br/>
       : Bridge |           |<br/>
       .........|......     |<br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
                |     :     |<br/>
<br/>
Mexico picks up territory under the bridge as the river moves south,<br/>
and the US picks up territory everywhere else but under the bridge as<br/>
the river moves south.... that sounds fair.<br/>
<br/>
In DE-LUX condominium, where there is the bridge we have already<br/>
discussed, we seem to have:<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
        .|                 |.<br/>
        .|  Condominium    |.<br/>
  L     .|                 |.      Germany<br/>
  u     .|     River       |.<br/>
  x     .|                 |.<br/>
  e     .....................<br/>
  m   ------------.------------<br/>
  b               .   Bridge<br/>
  o               . <br/>
  u   ------------.------------        <br/>
  r     .....................     <br/>
  g     .|                 |.<br/>
        .|                 |.<br/>
        .|                 |.<br/>
        .|                 |.<br/>
<br/>
 <br/>
<br/>
Do we have a condominium divided into two parts, a condominium with an<br/>
exclave of the big part to the north of the bridge south of the bridge<br/>
surrounded by Luxembourg, Germany and France?  Or, do we have an<br/>
exclave of the small southern part on the north of the bridge<br/>
surrounded by Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium?  Or is the border<br/>
across the bridge creating a Jungholz sort of affair connected by the<br/>
widthless border across the bridge?<br/>
<br/>
LN <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 <br/>
<br/>
    <br/>
      <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; aha<br/>
&gt; i have seen these on bridge railings or edges<br/>
&gt; & dont they then mark<br/>
&gt; besides the path of the boundary across the bridge<br/>
&gt; the paths of its lateral displacements from the living thalweg <br/>
&gt; precisely along these railings or edges<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; so i think they have inadvertently given us 2 smoking guns here<br/>
&gt; settling the matter once & for all<br/>
&gt; against any possible de jure vertical differentiation of sovereignty<br/>
&gt; without ever really meaning to address the matter<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; it just hasnt dawned on them yet<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; </span></blockquote></div>