1. London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    You re right. Me shooting my keyboard off again. and about Aldwych. I meant Aldgate, at the eastern edge of the Circle Line. Sorry. I ll have to dig out the
    Jun 15, 2001 @ 09:26 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
  2. Re: London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    Aha. In that case, it could be the boundary London/Tower Hamlets. Nice you mention all these metro things. I m a big fan of these. I just wrote an article on
    Jun 15, 2001 @ 10:32 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    The underground issue is a bid off-topic. Perhaps we should make a new group. Just to brag a little bit: I was employed by London Transport in 1988-1990. Had a
    Jun 18, 2001 @ 05:49 - Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen ("Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  4. Re: London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    ... new group. Perhaps we should. ... 1988-1990. Had a free travel pass and did all sorts of things like seeing all stations. ... atlas of London, go check the
    Jun 18, 2001 @ 09:23 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    Yes, I do mean Epping Forest and Enfield, and even Waltham Forest and Enfield. My map is a London Streetfinder of 1994. Jesper ... From: Peter Smaardijk
    Jun 18, 2001 @ 12:55 - Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen ("Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    Peter A bid late, but here are scanned maps of the local border in NW London Jesper ... From: Peter Smaardijk To:
    Jul 12, 2001 @ 18:50 - Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen ("Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen" <jesniel@image.dk>)
  7. Re: London underground and Russian pene-enclave
    Thanks. I see what you mean. No such boundary fun on my map, though. So maybe the boundary was rectified after your map was published, or my map is wrong.
    Jul 16, 2001 @ 10:41 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)