Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] tp belgium germany holland aka bedenl
Date: Nov 13, 2000 @ 00:50
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>
>What about the south pole, for 2 Aussie bits, a NZ bit, a French one, a Brit
>one (or Chilean or Agentinian), and the unclaimed/Norwegian bit. That's 6,
>with 2 overlapping claims...
>
>I presume you've seen the Simpson's episode where they all hold hands at
>'5-corners' where 5 US states meet...
>
>Brendan
>
>
>>From: michael donner <m@...>
>>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
>>To: boundarypoint@egroups.com
>>Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [BoundaryPoint] tp belgium germany holland aka bedenl
>>Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:28:08 -0400
>>
>>ok brendan
>>beautiful visitation report
>>
>>& glad to have these corrections & multi negations
>>from which i gather you mean you would end the multipoint chronology
>>attempted below with the treaty of versailles itself in 1919 rather than
>>continue it to 1977
>>& that the bedenl tripoint actually reached its present configuration no
>>later than versailles itself
>>since both moresnet & eupenmalmedy effectively became belgium at that time
>>regardless of the bogus plebiscite & bogus ratification & the subsequent
>>reorganizations you mentioned
>>
>>that is fine with me
>>nor do i regret the loss of this putative ghost quintipoint in any case
>>since i believe its removal from consideration leaves on the quinti level
>>besides an also recently defunct quintiadministrative point of a certain
>>pacific archipelago whose name i forget
>>only the actual quinticounty point of lake okeechobee
>>aka usfl3glhemaokpa
>>still in the running for global maxipoint
>>
>>i mean it is no longer any contest at all so far as i can tell
>>
>>glhemaokpa simply is the global maxipoint designate
>>
>>& i probably dont have to remind anyone here that the pa of glhemaokpa is
>>none other than palm beach county
>>
>>so if anyone was wanting more of a recount there we would have to also
>>recount glades & hendry & martin & okeechobee counties too within the
>>global meltdown epicenter
>>
>>m
>>
>>
>>
>> >>From: "Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>
>> >
>> >no, no ,no,
>> >what i meant was, accordingf to Versailles, Moresnet was integrated into
>> >Belgium along with Epen/Malmedy (subject to a plebiscite where those NOT
>> >wanting to be Belgianised could sign a register in public in front of
>> >Belgian police. some free vote! Funnily enough, few did so.
>> >So 1921 (or 22?) it was all confirmed, belgium having admined the area in
>> >the meantime.
>> >Moresnet became a Belgiuan commune then, and it was not until the
>>municipal
>> >reoganisation of 1977 that commune Moresnet was joined to other communes
>>to
>> >make a new, larger commune. Neutral Moresnet disappeared in 1918/9 at
>> >Versailles.
>> >Apparently the border stones still exist and thesre is a wlkaing trail
>> >around them. The day i was there (yesterday) there was a hunt on in the
>> >forest making up much of the old Neut Moresnet, so it was offlimits
>>because
>> >of Belgian idiots running riot with red jackets and shotguns.
>> >So for a while the Belgian border was more dangerous to me than the
>>Indian
>> >border!
>> >
>> >Brendan
>> >
>> >
>> >>From: michael donner <m@...>
>> >>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
>> >>To: boundarypoint@egroups.com
>> >>Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] tp belgium germany holland aka bedenl
>> >>Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 04:27:40 -0400
>> >>
>> >><<http://home.hccnet.nl/c.damen/images/landkaart/landkaart_stip.jpg>
>>http://home.hccnet.nl/c.damen/images/landkaart/landkaart_stip.jpg>
>> >><http://home.hccnet.nl/c.damen/images/landkaart/landkaart_stip.jpg>
>>http://home.hccnet.nl/c.damen/images/landkaart/landkaart_stip.jpg gives
>>a
>> >>nice outline map of neutral moresnet & shows how it used to meet the
>>bedenl
>> >>point in at least a quadripoint
>> >>
>> >>note
>> >> netherlands is at upper left
>> >> germany is at upper right
>> >> old belgium is to the left of the blue dot area
>> >> moresnet or kelmis is within the blue dot area
>> >> eupen malmedy is to the right of the blue dot area
>> >>
>> >>upon further study
>> >>i believe this bedenl point may also have been not just a legal
>>quadripoint
>> >>but fully a legal quintipoint between 1919 & 1922
>> >>still only trinational in composition but quintipartite in form
>> >>when the 2 distinct but adjacent & convergent expatriated zones are
>> >>considered along with & separate from the 3 countries themselves
>> >>
>> >>based on the info from brendan below & gideon & other sources
>> >>the chronology of the development of the point seems to be
>> >>1815 tripoint moresnet netherlands prussia north
>> >>1839 quadripoint belgium moresnet netherlands prussia
>> >>1871 quadripoint belgium germany moresnet netherlands
>> >>1919 quintipoint belgium eupen&malmedy germany moresnet netherlands
>> >>1922 quadripoint belgium germany kelmis netherlands
>> >>1940 1945 intermezzo
>> >>1945 quadripoint belgium germany kelmis netherlands resumes
>> >>1977 tripoint belgium germany netherlands
>> >>
>> >>the trickiest part occurs between the treaty of versailles in 1919 & the
>> >>belated belgian confirmation to the league of nations in 1922 that the
>> >>confirmational plebiscite mandated for eupen malmedy in 1920 was in fact
>> >>completed
>> >>
>> >>if the moresnet or kelmis area was not fully integrated into belgium
>>until
>> >>1977 as mentioned below
>> >>but remained until then & except during world war 2 an international
>>rather
>> >>than an exclusively belgian entity & territory
>> >> the terms of the treaty of versailles to the contrary notwithstanding
>> >>& if eupen malmedy was also not fully & legally integrated into belgium
>> >>until after the league of nations confirmed the plebiscite in 1922
>> >>then bedenl was a legal quintipoint between 1919 & 1922
>> >>& still a legal quadripoint as recently as 1977
>> >> or i am deceived
>> >>
>> >>m
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >thank you brendan
>> >> >
>> >> >these are the data i wanted
>> >> >
>> >> >fantastic
>> >> >
>> >> >m
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Actually it was a quadripoint from 1815-1918.
>> >> >>Moresnet was in dispute between Prussia and Holland afteer the
>>Congress
>> >>of
>> >> >>Vienna and so became a neutral zone between them (it contianed a
>> >>valuable
>> >> >>zinc mine).
>> >> >>In 1830 Belgium became indep, and Moresnet became a Belg/Prussian
>> >>neutral
>> >> >>zone, but still connected to Netherlands by a single point.
>> >> >>1918 treaty of Versailles, Belgium was awarded Eupen in Prussia (to
>>be
>> >> >>affirmed by a 'plebiscite'in 1920) and so apart fomr the point,
>>Moresnet
>> >>was
>> >> >>now totally surrounded by Belgium (still it met Neth and Germany at
>>the
>> >> >>point), so it was given to Belgium too.
>> >> >>In 1977 Moresnet commune was amalgamated with nearby commeunes, so
>>the
>> >>shape
>> >> >>of it has changed only recently. 1815-1977 it existed as an
>> >>international
>> >> >>entity or a commune (called Kelmis by the Belgians).
>> >> >>Brendan
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>From: michael donner <m@...>
>> >> >>>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
>> >> >>>To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
>> >> >>>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] tp belgium germany holland aka bedenl
>> >> >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:32:31 -0400
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>the present bedenl point was between 1919 & 1922 actually a
>> >> >>> >trinational quadripoint with a binational bede neutral zone
>> >> >>> >& the conjunction as a whole was therefore topologically identical
>>to
>> >>the
>> >> >>> >other suspected similarly defunct example which arif is on the
>>track
>> >>of
>> >> >>>at
>> >> >>> >present day tp iraq kuwait saudi arabia
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>& if you zoom in on bedenl at mapquest
>> >> >>>you will see a municipal boundary also converging upon it from the
>>ssw
>> >> >>>which in fact formerly separated the bede neutral zone from belgium
>> >> >>>& thus for a few years promoted this tp into a trinational
>>quadripoint
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>m