Subject: world class coastal boundary roundup<br/>
Date: Dec 17, 2002 @ 06:36<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 &lt;orc@orcoast.com&gt; (&quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@...&gt;&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8383.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8386.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1914.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8383.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8385.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1938661161">besides the cygb coastal boundary just confirmed by grant<br/>
& the weird cafr coastal boundary also just contemplated <br/>
there is in addition the esfr condo coastal boundary <br/>
as originally reported by peter in message 1577 <br/>
complete with a sketch<br/>
<br/>
but it appears on closer examination that the hoped for hnnisv <br/>
tridominium coastal probability has pooped out<br/>
since it only abuts the closing line of the gulf of fonseca<br/>
rather than any actual coastline per se<br/>
& it still lacks the necessary tripartite ratification anyway<br/>
<br/>
so the grand total of confirmed international coastal boundaries <br/>
holds steady at 1<br/>
& perhaps another half or so<br/>
depending on what & how anyone cares to count<br/>
<br/>
but all 3 remaining candidates are special cases<br/>
1 clave <br/>
1 condo <br/>
& 1 metabounder<br/>
<br/>
so theres nothing normal or ordinary yet in this entire category<br/>
<br/>
but how could there be<br/>
since normally the sea is supposed to follow the land <br/>
& does<br/>
<br/>
hmm<br/>
that leads me to wonder if the south orkneys or any other islands <br/>
lying south of s lat 60 might qualify<br/>
since they can have no maritime territory <br/>
per the antarctic treaty<br/>
<br/>
but then do these islands even have a nationality any longer<br/>
or is it just everyones land meeting everyones water there<br/>
as is the case along the coast of antarctica itself<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002 <br/>
&lt;orc@o...&gt;&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; absolutely<br/>
&gt; its a winner<br/>
&gt; the winner<br/>
&gt; thanx<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Grant Hutchison&quot; <br/>
&gt; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; & it looks like the map needed for confirming the coastal<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; boundary may be found at this expired link in message <br/>
 </span></blockquote>2155<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; &gt; so i wish grant or someone would kindly renovate it<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; or somehow refresh our memory of it<br/>
&gt; &gt; It was always slightly blurred. Attached is a better image that <br/>
&gt; I&#39;m sure has<br/>
&gt; &gt; been previously posted to BoundaryPoint, but it takes less <br/>
 </span></blockquote>time <br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; to post it<br/>
&gt; &gt; again than to find the previous version.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; you aint kiddin<br/>
&gt; it took me weeks to find even this </span></blockquote></div>