Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] the american coastal honor guard  or the 18 u s marines<br/>
Date: Aug 06, 2000 @ 15:56<br/>
Author: David Mark (David Mark &lt;dmark@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="290.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="298.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic284.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="291.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="293.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-304864632">On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, michael donner wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; i would say then  if 65 then 83  but  if 61 then 61  to be sure<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Personally I only find the points interesting if there are three or more<br/>
regions or partitions AT THE SAME LEVEL in the political hierarchy come<br/>
together.  So, I don&#39;t find the 2-states-at-the-3-mile-limit points of any<br/>
interesting.  (I actually find the 2-states-and-the-ocean a little more<br/>
interesting, and they are visitable [half dry], but they are not on my<br/>
&quot;things to do&quot; list.)  So, the tri-country points are very interesting.<br/>
 <br/>
Chacun a son gout.<br/>
<br/>
David<br/>
<br/>
PS: In the spirit of NAFTA, if you want to inventory the<br/>
2-state-1-province and 1-state-2-province points along the Canadian<br/>
border, you should also include the tri-state points along the Mexican<br/>
border, I guess there are 9 of those...</div>