Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] the american coastal honor guard or the 18 u s marines
Date: Aug 06, 2000 @ 04:27
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


another interesting & very substantial agreement david
& i think we benefit greatly also from having these 2 different viewpoints

in fact i so appreciate what i take to be your purely topological & set
theory approach to the bookkeeping that i seem to have adopted it also for
keeping track precisely of the politically disparate but mereotopologically
equivalent members of my more inclusive roster & of the sets i am
considering generally
in a world where it is the routine rather than the unthinkable exception
for parts to combine with the wholes of which they are part
as do the dc tripoint constituents for example
or even for a whole to combine & recombine with other primary
manifestations of itself
as in various north canadian trifederal subdivisional points
or wilder yet when such a triferderalness then clones 17 times
as appears to have actually happened last year along the northwest &
nunavut territorial coasts where the canadian count of major subdivisional
multipoints was more than doubled in a single new boundary line last year

or so it appears in my left minds eye while in my right minds eye i
imagine lucky you just counting up zero triprovincials for canada & calling
it a day
& of course both views are equally true but truer together than separately

i would say then if 65 then 83 but if 61 then 61 to be sure
& i would keep both 83 & 61
just as i would say for canada if 4 then probably 32 but if 0 then 0
& then keep both 32 & 0

but i think 65 like 4 tho obvious is in the end hard to maintain

in this i think i have just started out as a strictly mereotopological
punctologist studying multisubdivisional points generally while you are
training me to also be a perhaps less punctological mereotopologist in
focusing more on the facts & nicetries of conjunction than just on the
points of conjunction themselves

i find this dichotomy is already extremely useful for balancing thought
processes but i fancy it will soon be doing yeoman to superhuman work in
simplifying & tracking some of the more staggering complexities of the
world class

so thank you for understanding & bearing with me all this time

i think the real caper may just be beginning now

m


& you are right also that tho pa & ct are technically coastal they are both
prevented by the narrowness of their access to the sea from ever reaching
the 3 mile limit or rather vice versa
as is nicely shown for ct at
http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=41.1759&lon=-72.0003&s=200&size=l
& as will then be fairly obvious for pa too