Subject: continued haply ever after
Date: Aug 06, 2000 @ 19:28
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


>Personally I only find the points interesting if there are three or more
>regions or partitions AT THE SAME LEVEL in the political hierarchy come
>together. So, I don't find the 2-states-at-the-3-mile-limit points of any
>interesting. (I actually find the 2-states-and-the-ocean a little more
>interesting, and they are visitable [half dry], but they are not on my
>"things to do" list.)

i am multi glad you said that
because it is good to learn your interests & tastes
& it confirms & encourages my own subjective impressions & assessments

>
>
>So, the tri-country points are very interesting.

definitely

do you have any opinions or suggestions about how these should be
inventoried or otherwise collected

i would love to hear from you in depth about this topic
or anyhow you like

>
>Chacun a son gout.
>
>David

precisement & bon appetit

ton pantagruel omnivorace
m

>
>PS: In the spirit of NAFTA, if you want to inventory the
>2-state-1-province and 1-state-2-province points along the Canadian
>border, you should also include the tri-state points along the Mexican
>border, I guess there are 9 of those...

this is also too cool

actually i see jack lists 8
but they really are authentic tristates

frankly i am a little skittish about playing in traffic around & within mexico
tho i would dearly love to make a road dash for the guatemalan trinational pair

& mexican domestic tristates are a vast terra incognita & probably
perpetual wildlife preserve for the most fanatical tristate diehards among
us

but you know
canada was hard enough & plenty lebensraum for me

say
what is your opinion if any of the major canadian domestic points

like do you acknowledge the 4 corners of the north as anything
or any federal territories
or what
etc
etc