Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Fiat boundaries<br/>
Date: May 01, 2001 @ 09:22<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="2251.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2279.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2251.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="2251.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2253.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-887590785">in practical reality probably none of them<br/>
since surveys have generally wandered a bit<br/>
  not to mention the earth curvature<br/>
<br/>
like even the famous colorado & wyoming quadrilaterals just mentioned as<br/>
paragons have perceptible jogs in their boundaries if you look at all<br/>
closely<br/>
<br/>
but if you would allow 99 percent straight or curved<br/>
that might make a nice long list<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;Which international boundaries are 100% fiat, meaning 100% straight?<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;On the map I see:<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Morocco-Western Sahara<br/>
&gt;Algeria-Mauretania<br/>
&gt;Western Sahara-Algeria<br/>
&gt;Nigeria-Chad<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;But perhaps there are minor irregularities I cannot see on my map, so who<br/>
&gt;can confirm this?<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Jesper<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor<br/>
&gt;&lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=190462.1393721.2979173.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700126166:N/A=55">http://rd.yahoo.com/M=190462.1393721.2979173.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700126166:N/A=55</a><br/>
&gt;1015/?<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.debticated.com">http://www.debticated.com</a>  target=&quot;_top&quot;&gt;    Your use of Yahoo!<br/>
&gt;Groups is subject to the &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a>&gt; Yahoo! Terms<br/>
&gt;of Service. </span></blockquote></div>