Subject: Re: first try at a complete punctoscopy of canada
Date: Apr 25, 2001 @ 01:39
Author: bjbutler@bjbsoftware.com (bjbutler@...)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


I especially like the mess the USGS made of the county names on the
map at http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=16&n=3861385&e=399715&size=m.

BJB


--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@h...> wrote:
>
>
>
> >From: David Mark <dmark@g...>
> >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@y...
> >To: BoundaryPoint@y...
> >Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] first try at a complete punctoscopy
of canada
> >Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Brendan Whyte wrote:
> >
> > > That theriver here has been dammed (when?) means the line is no
longer
> >on a
> > > bank, and created a little fragment of Al on the Ms side of the
line
> >south
> > > from Bear Ck, which was once no doubt all land, and not lake.
> >
> >Sorry, but I cannot find the fragment that you are refering to on
these
> >maps. I also cannot find "Bear Creek"
>
> Whoops. Try
> http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=16&n=3861385&e=399715&size=m
>
> The state boundary follows the Tennessee river, then heads W of S
formthe
> mouth of Bear Creek. Whereas in days of yore the creek was just
that, this
> was no problem. Now with the damming of the Tennessee river, the
creek
> mounth has also been flooded, making a large estuary, and leavbing
an
> isolated patch of Alabama on the west bank, a pene enclave. This
phenomenon
> has happened at various other US dams too. It is nice to see the
maps show
> the original Bear creek course, so one can better understand the
boundary.
>
> BW
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
___
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com