Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] trinational point twins list in progress<br/>
Date: Jul 11, 2000 @ 15:02<br/>
Author: rhall@quadritek.com (rhall@...)<br/>
<a href="190.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="193.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic190.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="191.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="193.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1410804478"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;  bahryun & bahryus<br/>
&gt;     bosnia croatia yugoslavia<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>If we have an &quot;imminent&quot; category, need we<br/>
an &quot;unimminent&quot; category, or would it be better<br/>
to avoid anything that can be misconstrued as <br/>
a political view in both cases?  Who knows <br/>
who wiill be first ... (I&#39;ll admit that I <br/>
am surprised that there is no ISO code <br/>
here; TP has been around for ages)<br/>
 <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;imminent<br/>
&gt;  & possibly compound<br/>
&gt; &gt;iljopsn & iljopss<br/>
&gt; &gt;   israel jordan palestine<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>-- <br/>
randy &quot;the mapsurfer&quot;</div>