Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] trinational point twins list in progress<br/>
Date: Jul 11, 2000 @ 16:38<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="192.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="194.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic190.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="192.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="194.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1014281911">now you have me completely stumped  randy<br/>
<br/>
& i am only guessing at your meaning here<br/>
<br/>
i assume you are saying tp for east timor<br/>
& that you are questioning the actuality of the bahryu pair mentioned below<br/>
& also the imminence of the iljops pair or pairs mentioned farther below<br/>
while perhaps referring to the iso list as a whole<br/>
whether the one posted as our bottom link<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/codlstp1/en_listp1.html">http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/codlstp1/en_listp1.html</a><br/>
or some other rendition<br/>
i dont know<br/>
<br/>
& dont understand<br/>
<br/>
but cwould you say more & help me out<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;&gt;  bahryun & bahryus<br/>
&gt;&gt;     bosnia croatia yugoslavia<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;If we have an &quot;imminent&quot; category, need we<br/>
&gt;an &quot;unimminent&quot; category, or would it be better<br/>
&gt;to avoid anything that can be misconstrued as<br/>
&gt;a political view in both cases?  Who knows<br/>
&gt;who wiill be first ... (I&#39;ll admit that I<br/>
&gt;am surprised that there is no ISO code<br/>
&gt;here; TP has been around for ages)<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;&gt; &gt;imminent<br/>
&gt;&gt;  & possibly compound<br/>
&gt;&gt; &gt;iljopsn & iljopss<br/>
&gt;&gt; &gt;   israel jordan palestine<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;--<br/>
&gt;randy &quot;the mapsurfer&quot;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>m</div>