Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] maritime sovereignty and jurisdiction
Date: Mar 14, 2001 @ 04:47
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>
>>If you accept the above argument, the only islands which would meet
>>Brendan's strict definition of an enclave
>
>...AT SEA...
>
>>would be those whose
>>territorial sea is totally surrounded by the territorial sea of
>>another state - and, as yet, I have been unable to think of any....
>
>Thanks Martin.
>
>
>Enclaves are most useful when considered for areas of equal/similar
>sovereignty, ie EITHER internal units OR nations, OR EEZs/Highseas, etc.
>Thus we can think of high seas enclaves in EEZs or EEZs inside other EEZs
>(ie St Pierre, Channel Islands, Monaco) or national level enclaves in
>nations, but enclaves at one level bordering on a unit of higher level of
>sovereignty are less interesting as they have fewer practical implications.
>Hence less interest in the 2 or 3 Belgian provincial fragments that adjoin
>its neighbouring nations.
>
>Afetr Namibia's independence, S.Africa claimed many of the islands along its
>coast, often little more than stacks. The Terr. Sea they had was often
>within that of Namibia fomr the sketch maps I have seen.
>
>B
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
><http://www.hotmail.com> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
><"http://rd.yahoo.com/M=163100.1357384.2947150.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700126166:N/A=5
>24804/*http://www.classmates.com/index.tf?s=2629" target="_top">Cick here
>for Classmates.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Yahoo! Terms of Service.