Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Sokh, Vorukh, and others
Date: Mar 05, 2001 @ 08:08
Author: Peter Smaardijk (Peter Smaardijk <peter.smaardijk@and.com>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> >On this site: http://home.wanadoo.nl/sota/fergana.htm , there is talk ofYou are quite right. I should have read it with more attention.
> >seven enclaves within
> >Kyrgyzstan, 4 Uzbek ones (of which two are identified as Sokh and
> >Shakhimardan), and 3 Tadzhik ones
> >(one identified as Vorukh, and another one, not named, is probably the
> >long, narrow one).
> >
> No, as in my previous post, there are 7 total, 6 in Kyrgizia (4 Uzbeki and 2
> Tajiki) and 1 Tajiki in Uzbek. The article makes this clear too.
> >Also, there should be Kyrgyz enclaves in Uzbekistan too, according to thisWouldn't be the first example of a prime minister (in this case the Uzbek pm) who is misinformed.
> >news item (Kabar, Kyrgyz
> >national news agency): http://www.kabar.gov.kg/english/opi/2001/2/26.html .
> >Look for the item
> >"Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan reached agreement on border delimitation
> >issues". Anybody has names and
> >locations for these?
>
> This is wrong. There are no Kyrgyz enclaves in Uzbekistan. If there are,
> they are VERY SMALL as they do not appear on 1:200k and even 1:100k mapping
> of the area.