OK thanks Mike...please keep me posted if you would...I hope we can do hahimapo, but it'll still be there "down the road".

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Donner [mailto:m@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 4:02 PM
To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] laorospo case closed at last

yes

all the many multipoints defined by section corner ought to conform to this legal standard

but i think all the others not defined in such a way

including most of the rivery & lakey ones

& therefore probably the majority

would not be marked in this way or indeed at all

thats my guess anyway on the strength of the single florida county boundary marker any member has ever reported finding

namely yourself

i think i will continue my perusal & search for a second example this week tho

but i have to tell you our geographic rendezvous on this theme for march 3 is now blinking amber or even red now

since i now think i may well be blowing north before that

but will be in touch anyway

>From: "Bill Hanrahan"
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] laorospo case closed at last
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:05:26 -0500
>
>That's great news Mike! If that's the case, can we generally assume that
>all Florida quad (and tri, I suppose) points are marked similarly? Do you
>think it's conceivable that a tri/quadpoint might not be comprised of
>section corners, but some other defined origin?
>
>BTW, the weekend of March 3-4 still looks good, except that I need to attend
>a brief function for my granddaughter on the morning of the 3rd. Other than
>that, I can meet you down at hahimapo.
>
>B

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.