Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] laorospo case closed at last
Date: Feb 22, 2001 @ 16:02
Author: Michael Donner ("Michael Donner" <m@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
yes
all the many multipoints defined by section corner ought to conform to this legal standard
but i think all the others not defined in such a way
including most of the rivery & lakey ones
& therefore probably the majority
would not be marked in this way or indeed at all
thats my guess anyway on the strength of the single florida county boundary marker any member has ever reported finding
namely yourself
i think i will continue my perusal & search for a second example this week tho
but i have to tell you our geographic rendezvous on this theme for march 3 is now blinking amber or even red now
since i now think i may well be blowing north before that
but will be in touch anyway
>From: "Bill Hanrahan" >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com >To: >Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] laorospo case closed at last >Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:05:26 -0500 > >That's great news Mike! If that's the case, can we generally assume that >all Florida quad (and tri, I suppose) points are marked similarly? Do you >think it's conceivable that a tri/quadpoint might not be comprised of >section corners, but some other defined origin? > >BTW, the weekend of March 3-4 still looks good, except that I need to attend >a brief function for my granddaughter on the morning of the 3rd. Other than >that, I can meet you down at hahimapo. > >B